- How anal is the officiating when it comes to pass interference? If they look at those plays real close under review why not one like this?
- Does intent really matter? If a player doesn't intend to cause pass interference but they do it anyway the same flag is thrown.
I honestly don't know what your argument is here, or, more specifically, why you would care so much if this was called a penalty or not. There was a pass interference no-call in your favor as well, and it probably cost the Broncos 4-points in that game. Whether Welker's hit was a penalty seems beside the point to me anyway...in my mind, the question is whether the play was dirty or not. I don't think Welker deserves the animosity some Pats fans are directing at him. That's what I'm talking about.
But about the penalty or lack thereof:
First of all, pass interference is not reviewable...we'll start there. I'd be first in line to say that it SHOULD be. Anything should be reviewable. You see it all the time where there was something like a 50-yard penalty or more on a complete bull**** PI call. Now, how does it make sense that something like that cannot be contested? That's a game-changing call right there.
Look at what happened last week in the Seattle game. The 49ers' Bowman CLEARLY forced a fumble on the goal-line and came down with possession of the ball...****ed up his knee big-time in the process as well, probably a severe MCL injury. Everyone and their grandmother knew Bowman had possession of the ball, but it's not reviewable. Seattle kept the ball on that play because that's what was called on the field, even though everyone knew that was wrong. That's just adding insult to injury, literally. Things like this piss everyone off on a weekly basis. I wonder if the league came out with a statement about THAT.
And don't expect the league to always tell the truth. In Welker's case, they probably said "close enough" and swept in under the rug. IMO, it was close enough, but I can see how Pats fans would disagree...so don't slam me. But look at the way the NFL handled the last second play in the Seattle/Green Bay game with the replacement officials...remember that? They didn't admit they were wrong there either (they were), and that ruling determined the outcome of the game...Welker's play did not determine the outcome of the game in terms of whether it was called a penalty or not. Personally, I can see how it wasn't called, even though it really was a penalty by a hair.
The real issue is whether it was a dirty hit. I don't think it was malicious in nature, and I can't find too many people outside of New England that thinks that it was, can you?