Welcome to PatsFans.com

Bam Childress activated, Smith waived

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by tedster822, Sep 9, 2006.

  1. tedster822

    tedster822 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

  2. mavfan2390

    mavfan2390 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    1,067
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    well....that was pointless (i'm sure thats the first thing 99% of you thought after reading this thread)
  3. desi-patsfan

    desi-patsfan Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    2,163
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Hmm Smith being waived confuses me. Are they hoping to just sign him to the PS or something?
  4. RPCity

    RPCity Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    170
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Welcome back welcome back welcome baaaack......


    I know Im overrating Bam Bam and I dont care....but I love the fact that he's going to be on the roster for opening night.
  5. PatsWickedPissah

    PatsWickedPissah PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Messages:
    22,515
    Likes Received:
    75
    Ratings:
    +86 / 0 / -0

    Disable Jersey

    On the roster but will the brutha be active?
    Inquiring minds gots ta KNOW!!!
  6. RPCity

    RPCity Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    170
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Game 1 WRs:

    Bingo Brown
    Jackson
    Gabriel
    Reche


    He'd be our fifth obviously. He did out perform Caldwell in the preseason by the numbers but I wasn't able to watch any of those games. I'm still not the most informed football fan out there....what's the active roster size the NFL allows? Obviously 53 for the season, but on game day how many can be active and dressed?

    With Jackson healthy I'd say it hurts Bam's chances of being active a little more obviously. We'll see soon enough though.
  7. SVN

    SVN Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Messages:
    22,514
    Likes Received:
    14
    Ratings:
    +14 / 0 / -0

    probably signed smith to get any of the bills gameplan and then released him.
  8. JustWinBrady

    JustWinBrady Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2005
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    This may be a sign that jackson may not play this sunday. Bam probably knows the offense better that all the WRs but brown.
  9. lobster

    lobster Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2004
    Messages:
    481
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    This is a big move for Bam because I believe he will have his salary guaranteed for being on the roster for the Bills game. So congratulations to Bam!
  10. PatsWickedPissah

    PatsWickedPissah PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Messages:
    22,515
    Likes Received:
    75
    Ratings:
    +86 / 0 / -0

    Disable Jersey

    You well may be correct, but I thought that rule only applied to vets of N years not rookies. I'd bet on it.

    Anybody KNOW?
  11. Ceresco

    Ceresco Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2005
    Messages:
    590
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I very happy to see Bam back on the roster I think he has a lot of potential!
  12. lobster

    lobster Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2004
    Messages:
    481
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    You are correct and I was wrong.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    The Termination Pay benefit provides a guarantee of 100% of a player's "paragraph 5 [base] salary" IF HE HAS COMPLETED FOUR OR MORE CREDITED SEASONS. A player must be released after the club's first regular season game to get the benefit, and he must have made the active/inactive list at some point in the season.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Source:
    http://www.nflpa.org/Faqs/NFLPA_Faqs.aspx#6
  13. JoeSixPat

    JoeSixPat Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    9,800
    Likes Received:
    21
    Ratings:
    +24 / 0 / -0

    Well, Bam's not still a rookie, is he? I don't know the answer for sure but I think one's contract (and Bam was cut before being re-signed so I don't assume to know what his contract currently is) is in fact guaranteed if they are on the roster as of game one.

    If not, your pay can be pro-rated.

    In this case, if they wanted to re-sign Smith on Monday they would not be on the hook for his full 2006 salary - and that might have been a factor here as well...

    Perhaps a situation where neither Childress nor Smith were going to be active tomorrow - and if the team needed to make a decision on which had shown the most upside and worthy of guranteeing a salary - it'd be Bam.

    Besides - no reason to tempt fate. With all the games tomorrow, a few WR injuries and they lose Bam to another team that would sign him off the practice squad.
  14. BillsFan4Life

    BillsFan4Life Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2006
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Wow, I always respected the Pats and thought they were above that kind of stuff. Signing a player for a day to get the opposing team's playbook, then waiving him. I didn't think the Pats would stoop to that level.

    Now I realize I am going to get flamed for that response, but try to think of things rationally. I guess this is what happens in the modern nfl...
  15. patchick

    patchick Moderatrix Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    11,112
    Likes Received:
    26
    Ratings:
    +34 / 0 / -0

    No flame, but another Bills fan came and said the same thing (more violently) in this thread:
    http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/showthread.php?t=41076
    To summarize, it's much more likely that his signing and release had to do with the health of the Patriots' return men. Both of the top KRs were injured and out of the last exhibition game, but both have recently returned to practice.
  16. kolbitr

    kolbitr Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    653
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    And why would they not want to keep him around for the Buffalo game itself? How many players play extra hard against the team that just cut them (see Heath Evans performance last year against Miami, e.g.)? I agree with the posters who think BB had wanted to bolster special teams, but perhaps it didn't work out.

    My personal thought is that these suspicions are a bit paranoid. Has any player ever claimed that Team X brought him in just to siphon off his knowledge before the next game? Share the story if you have heard it.
  17. Robdude

    Robdude Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Messages:
    675
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    I think the reason for this change is a little more straight forward then what I have seen here. One of the reasons (in my opinion) that Belichick is so successful is that he is willing to try things out and then scape the experiments that do not pan out. I don;t think he is happy with our WRs (and who is) so he figured he would give Smith a look. After looking at him for the week and did not see what he wanted to see soooo scrape Smith and move on.
  18. Box_O_Rocks

    Box_O_Rocks PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    Messages:
    20,550
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +25 / 0 / -0

    Smith has had a normal week of preperation to try and learn a role for this game. We had the report that he dropped a couple passes in the one practice observed by the media. He was cut by Buffalo, which meant he was unable to crack their WR line-up with more experience. It will be interesting to see if he does wind up on the Practice Squad, but Bam is clearly the better prepared WR for this game.

    Smith may have been waived because other KRs had returned to health (per patchick's analysis), but the question foremost in my mind with a shaky group of WRs, are they ready for some football? It would seem that Bam is insurance with Gabriel a newbie, Reche questionable, and Jackson a complete unknown who as a rookie is probably limited to situational play if he is activated. Bam is on the roster to play would be my guess.
  19. kolbitr

    kolbitr Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    653
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    One other thing I'd add: Jonathan Smith was one of twenty-one players that Buffalo released on Sept. 2. Some of these guys were picked up by other teams, most weren't, including a few with greater experience in Buffalo than Smith. So why was Smith signed instead of anyone else? I suspect BB liked his speed for special teams. Why he was cut, I don't know. I'm sure that the coaches asked him about Buffalo, but it seems a bit far-fetched to think he was signed solely for that purpose.
  20. JoeSixPat

    JoeSixPat Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    9,800
    Likes Received:
    21
    Ratings:
    +24 / 0 / -0

    Anything's possible - including the fact that BB, in need of additional returners and WRs, actually liked Smith

    Didn't Smith burn the Patriots and bring back a return for TD not so long ago? I think BB genuinely thought the guy was worth a look - but likely wasn't good enough to break into the active WRs for tomorrow.

    Why guarantee his annual salary if you don't need to then?

    Cut him, protect Bam from being snatched up by another team, re-sign Smith on a week by week basis if you need him later.
  21. pats1

    pats1 Moderator PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    13,261
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    To answer a few questions from the thread:

    -The gameday active roster limit is 45.

    -Players must have more than four accredited seasons to get a guaranteed salary by being on the roster for the first game. Bam has ZERO accredited seasons, so it's pro-rated salary for him.

    But one thing to remember on that issue is that a vested veteran (>4 accredited seasons) can only get termination pay for getting cut after the first game, so the rule doesn't necessarily apply outright.
    Last edited: Sep 9, 2006
  22. PatsSteve1

    PatsSteve1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    2,795
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

  23. NE39

    NE39 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,056
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    With Bam being signed to the active roster, it opens up a practice squad spot.

    I hope they sign Patrick Cobbs to fill it.
  24. patpatriot

    patpatriot Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2005
    Messages:
    807
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    The signing Cobbs idea is the only one that makes sense. Otherwise the cutting of Smith makes *no* sense given our average to poor punt return team.
  25. FloridaPatsFan

    FloridaPatsFan Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2005
    Messages:
    941
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    What if Buffalo now resigns smith and gets the Patriots Playbook?

    Personally, I think Bam Childress has ability that you can't quite describe. He might be an average player, but he has something. It seems that everytime I see him with the ball, I hold my breath expecting him to take one to the house. I am very glad to hear he's back on the team. I hope he stays for a while.
  26. ilduce06410

    ilduce06410 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2005
    Messages:
    916
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Cobbs traded to Steelers, yes?

    i thought he went to pittsburgh for a player to be named later.
  27. spidey2559

    spidey2559 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2006
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

  28. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    19,975
    Likes Received:
    24
    Ratings:
    +28 / 1 / -0

    Teams do sign players to get insight into the other team's playbook. USually they keep the player for a game or two, rather than make their intentions so obvious.


  29. PlattsFan

    PlattsFan Rookie

    Joined:
    May 25, 2006
    Messages:
    423
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    I always think that "grab the guy for the playbook" issue is overblown. Most teams run a similar set of plays out of a set style of offense; it's rare you really see a completely new play. And Belichick/Pees/etc can break down the basics of an offense from looking at the film ... I doubt a WR from another team can really add all that much. Not enough to justify the cost in time and effort to bring the guy in, imo.

    The simplest explanation is usually the best: they didn't like what they saw from Smith enough to keep him and/or they needed the spot on the PS. And Maroney's healthy enough to return kicks, if needed.
  30. pats60

    pats60 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    408
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I think the real reason is the vikings took a wide reciever of
    seattle ps .
    They may have been after Bam. Thats why they may cut Smith

Share This Page