- Joined
- Dec 23, 2004
- Messages
- 5,250
- Reaction score
- 877
Since the news first broke that there was nothing new last week....each day the media haters continue to try to find something.
The latest that continues to grow every day now is the OFFENSIVE signal taping.
There are many cries for additional punishment because of it now....
1) Daily News
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/li...rts.html?in_article_id=565300&in_page_id=1781
2) NY Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/10/sports/football/10nfl.html
This all may come down to whether or not BB did indeed tell Goodell taping had occurred on both sides. If indeed he did, then once again, why the "F" doesn't Goodell simply have a quick statement confirming the Patriots had admitted to both.
Does anybody know if it was originally noted?
Mark my words - your papers are going to be filled with stories clamoring for more punishment and/or suspensions.
Man oh man - Tuesday cannot get here soon enough.
PS - if you really want to see how NY hatred is portrayed...read this beauty also from the NY Times with the usual chicken chit " unnamed NFL Executive":
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/11/sports/football/11nfl.html?_r=1&ref=sports&oref=slogin
The latest that continues to grow every day now is the OFFENSIVE signal taping.
There are many cries for additional punishment because of it now....
1) Daily News
NFL could fine Patriots again after 'spygate' tapes reveal they stole Miami Dolphins offensive signals
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/li...rts.html?in_article_id=565300&in_page_id=1781
2) NY Times:
But did that admission include the taping of both defensive and offensive signals?
In the statement the league released after it reached a legal agreement with Walsh, the N.F.L. said that Goodell had determined “the Patriots had violated league rules by videotaping opposing coaches’ defensive signals” throughout Belichick’s tenure as head coach.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/10/sports/football/10nfl.html
This all may come down to whether or not BB did indeed tell Goodell taping had occurred on both sides. If indeed he did, then once again, why the "F" doesn't Goodell simply have a quick statement confirming the Patriots had admitted to both.
Does anybody know if it was originally noted?
Mark my words - your papers are going to be filled with stories clamoring for more punishment and/or suspensions.
Man oh man - Tuesday cannot get here soon enough.
PS - if you really want to see how NY hatred is portrayed...read this beauty also from the NY Times with the usual chicken chit " unnamed NFL Executive":
In discussions of changes since 2000, one team, the New England Patriots, has surfaced more than any other, according to a longtime N.F.L. team executive with direct knowledge of the meetings.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/11/sports/football/11nfl.html?_r=1&ref=sports&oref=slogin
Last edited by a moderator: