- Joined
- Sep 1, 2010
- Messages
- 30,775
- Reaction score
- 38,038
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.=================
We were told by so many posters that 2016 would a cap disaster. Well, we're here. We haen't been in better cap shape for many years.
Agreed, i don't get why people want to trade a guy who gets around 10 sacks a year.It's ridiculous to trade a proven big, outside pass rusher for a lottery ticket.
People must have amnesia if they think we've had a proven young pass rusher in memory
Yes, and perhaps Grissom and Flowers will be able to replace him in 2017.The espn splits on Jones are very telling. All his sacks this year have come when the Pats have been winning or tied, he has 0 sacks when they have been trailing. In the last 6 games of the season he finished with 2 sack and both came against Tenn. Has zero sacks on grass and all of them have come on turf.
2 playoff games vs Denver and he has been shut out both times.
I could see him playing for a coach like Parcells and Parcells putting a gas can in his locker.
He's a 1st half player and fades mid year. The writing is on the wall when they drafted Flowers and Grissom.
You are free to worry about the 2017 and 2018 caps. When Miguel updates those, we can discuss those further.Not sure how you assume that (potentially) having 15 m dollars equates to "being in the best cap shape for many years?"
Didn't we just have about 25-30 in available space only a couple of years ago during the offseason? On top of that, we have 4 major players on defense that will need to be retained this year, including Sheard.
If people really think that we'll have 4-5 players making double digit salaries AAV, they haven't been paying attention to Belichick's value system and ability to replace through the draft. As far as Jones goes, yes they should likely keep him for 2016, unless they get a decent offer and/or they don't think he's worth the 7.799 million dollar cap hit.
You are free to worry about the 2017 and 2018 caps. When Miguel updates those, we can discuss those further.
As of right now, Miguel has us extending Collins, Hightower and Sheard with lots to spare, and this is while we KEEP Jones. There is NO 2016 cap need to trade Jones. And just BTW, keeping Jones has exactly ZERO effect on the 2017 cap.
Finding a guy in the draft that can get 10 sacks a year and set the edge is going to be tough to find.
Yes, and perhaps Grissom and Flowers will be able to replace him in 2017.
What I said was I don't understand how potentially having 15m dollars with 4 quality players that need extending this season (at least 1-2 are priorities right now) AND Butler equates to this being the best situation we've been in "many years." That isn't true. Hell, didn't we carry over double digits just recently, within the past couple/few years?
I also said that if people honestly believe that we're going to lock up HT, Collins, Sheard, and Jones PLUS Butler, they are delusional. We already have DMcC making double digit AAV money, so maybe there's room for a couple more. This isn't fantasy football, and would go against the exact philosophy that has allowed the team to remain a consistent winner. By that thinking, one can claim that Jones is likely the most expendable--even if I agree with you that it's probably best to keep him for 2016.
And just because Miguel writes his annual article on how we could potentially keep guys like Revis, Welker, etc doesn't necessarily mean that he believes that will happen, or is suggesting that's the best approach to take. He's simply breaking down various scenarios.