Wordsmyth
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2012
- Messages
- 3,637
- Reaction score
- 5,181
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
CLUSTERPUNT!
Puntbungle has my vote too (as does your Ron Borges signature quote!)
But I appear alone in Patriots nation in suggesting that Pagano was right in his playcall - but bears responsibility for the poor coaching that lead to the poor execution.
The Colts - near as I can figure - weren't running a fake punt per se. They were simply lined up oddly (illegally as it turned out - more bad coaching) and were not supposed to do ANYTHING aside from attempt to draw the Patriots offsides for the 1st down.
If the players execute as Pagano wanted, it was EXTREMELY low risk and high reward. Frankly Belichick might attempt to do the same thing, accepting a 5 yard penalty on the punt for delay of game for the chance at a 1st down.
NOW - was it foolish for Pagano to think he was going to catch the Patriots unprepared? Probably. But again, what did he have to lose?
Of course, bad coaching lead to the ball being snapped and the rest is history. But it was the right call executed poorly.
CLUSTERPUNT!
"4th and WTF!!"
Where did Johnson get the background blackboard from? There's actually some real stuff on it. For example, I see the definition of kinetic energy and the time-independent Schroedinger's Equation in the top left.
No way Johnson came up with that.
Where did Johnson get the background blackboard from? There's actually some real stuff on it. For example, I see the definition of kinetic energy and the time-independent Schroedinger's Equation in the top left.
No way Johnson came up with that.
Anytime you ask someone to do something that is outside the norm, there is a significant probability that they are going to get it wrong. When you ask 11 men to do something different, chances that at least 1 of them gets it wrong is pretty good. So there is no way that this was an extremely low risk play.
As far as the high reward goes, there are 2 possibilities that were mentioned but Chuck Pagano that I remember - the Patriots do an substitution causing a possible 12 men on the field penalty (really? you've got to be kidding me) or the Patriots don't line up correctly. If the Patriots don't line up correctly, then the Colts need to be highly alert to take advantage of this before the Patriots correct it and they need to, as individuals and as a unit, make the right decision and act decisively to pick up the first down. Right.
The concept was a disaster given the planning, preparation and general ability of the Colts players. A team like the Patriots *might* be able to pull it off, but I'm not sure I'd want to put them in that position where a lot can go wrong. Of course, the Patriots would have practiced it until they got it consistently right and, even then, I'm not sure it's worth the risk to run it given the nature of the risks.
Where did Johnson get the background blackboard from? There's actually some real stuff on it. For example, I see the definition of kinetic energy and the time-independent Schroedinger's Equation in the top left.
No way Johnson came up with that.
Punt guano.I submit my own name that I'm surprised no one else has come up with yet - the "Puntgano."
It sounds like Pagano, which is funny because it was his screw up, and also is funny because this screwed up punt will make him gone-o.
I like "Clusterpunt" better, though.
Who's the happiest man on earth this morning?