i disagree. The pats amde apparent severla wewaknesses thta the Seahwks ahve.
1. They have no superstars at receiver or TE. The Pats have two, in Gronk and Edelmen.
2. The big Seahawk secondary has problems handling smaller, quicker, more agile receivers, if those receivers are employed properly.
3 The Seahawk Offense is overated, and not deep. Lynch is an older, complete back, but there is not much in reserve.
4. Wilson is not (yet) a great Passer. He is a very good scrambler and can throw deep accurately, while buying time for his nondescript receivers to un-cover. I doubt he could do "a Brady" and throw 50 passes, carry the entire team on his passing arm, and win.
Wilson reminds me of Fran Tarkenton, the original Scrambler, who won a lot; but never won the big one.
5. On Defense, the Defensive line is not Great, merely good.
6. Observation: Teams built on Great Defenses alone, do not seem to endure long, at the top. The 1985 Bears, the 2000 Bucs, and the 2013 Seahawks join the 1963 Bears as the only such clubs I remember; and all were relatively "One Year Wonders".
