- Joined
- Sep 8, 2008
- Messages
- 3,876
- Reaction score
- 4,465
I have seen the shorter version of this. It is a critique of some of the theory used in the exponent report. I fast forwarded through this version but didnt see any controlled experimentation going on. Is there any? That is what I would like to see, to refute figures 29 and 30 of the Exponent Report.
Any scientific report can be critiqued for methodology. While the narrative on this board is that all scientists agree that the Patriots didnt deflate the balls, there were many physicists who came out in support of the Exponent Report when the media was playing that angle. When the tide turned after the Berman decision, Leonard showed up and the media began actively seeking out scientists that were critical of the Exponent Report. That, I think, has given the false impression that there is a scientific consensus.
Headsmart Labs study