PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

My Approach to this Draft


Wilfork's size doesn't have to be replaced. He's an avg. player at best right now. He played over 70pct of our plays and had 28 tackles with 25 assists. He has no short-area quickness and quite simply can't get to the ball carrier to finish a play. Zero sacks. Zero forced or recovered fumbles. He got an int against Oak because he was unable to get off the LOS and the ball landed on his belly. Hate to be so blunt about him. Great guy. We need to move on and save 7m. In 7 games Silega had 21 tackles with 23 assists and 2.5 sacks. That's my starting LDT. Backed up by Branch and a around 1-3 draft pick.
 
This is a great thread and thanks for starting it Mayo. I think its important to TRY and think like the Pats think even though they usually end up thinking so differently in the end.

You offer a interesting scenario with Hardison and Marpet. Given that you hit my 2 personal position priorities on the nose I have to be happy. I am a big believer that finding IMPACT interior DLmen is the most difficult thing after QB. Unfortunately my belief is pretty universal, so any player who potentially fits that role is going to go well before we get to pick at #32. And guys who are currently under the radar, like Hardison, are more likely to be candidates for "reaches".

MAYBE, a more traditional run stopper like Goldman might fall to us, but right now he is generally being mocked higher. If Ngata leaves the Ravens, its not likely Goldman gets past them. If he does, you have to hope that he develops like Wilkerson, who was considered to be a 3-4 DE run stuffer in the mold of Ty Warren, but turned into so much more.

You envision a logical plan to acquire Marpet and Hardison. Personally I think Hardison's rare potential would push him closer to #45 than #62. Usually trading down would solve this problem, but in THIS year I'm a big believer in Quality over quantity, so what would we have to give up to get from 62 to 45? I'd give up 2 picks Would our 4th and 6th be enough?

So in my scenario we trade up to get Hardison, Marpet goes to us in the 3rd, who do you like with that "bonus" first round pick. I hate to say it, but Todd Gurley is starting to look appetizing, especially if there is no one else around that knocks your socks off. However every time I think on it, I cringe. RB's are just so risky, and for our offense, they don't have to be special, just solid.

As to Marpet, he is an intriguing prospect. I'm just wondering about your prediction that he could start day one. That's quite a jump from division 3 to starting in the NFL in 4 months. I really hope we draft him, but if we do, we are likely to need a starting LG in place to start the season.

IC makes an interesting comment about needed the beef to replace Vince. But I think run stoppers are more common and available. You can pick up a Branch type cheaply in FA, or throughout the draft. In today's game a great run stopper like Goldman might be too much of a luxury at #32,......unless you see disruption potential that isn't evident now.

Again great thread
 
I think that you can't focus on too many players. Hardison and Marpet are my 2, and I think that the Pats should have the capital to get both on day 2 without breaking the bank. I don't know exactly how high they will end up, but it shouldn't be catastrophic. Marpet could go as high as you say, though I'd be a bit surprised - no Division III player has even been drafted since 1991.

As for the rest, I'd "go with the flow". Some guys will go too high, others will slip through the cracks. It's very hard to predict which, but I'd trust my board and not reach to fill positions based on perceived "need".

Again, this is a very different approach to this draft than I've had in the past, which is why I thought it worth discussing on its own. It's based on (1) 2 guys who I think will go day 2 who I really, really like, and (2) a lot of guys on day 1 and 3 who I like a lot, but not many for whom I would go "all in".

Regarding Marpet would it shock anyone if BB grabbed a "reach" at OL like the last time the Pats picked at #32?

I think BB took a page out of Jimmy Johnson's draft book when he advised BB to target the guys he liked and go get them.
 
Wilfork's size doesn't have to be replaced. He's an avg. player at best right now. He played over 70pct of our plays and had 28 tackles with 25 assists. He has no short-area quickness and quite simply can't get to the ball carrier to finish a play. Zero sacks. Zero forced or recovered fumbles. He got an int against Oak because he was unable to get off the LOS and the ball landed on his belly. Hate to be so blunt about him. Great guy. We need to move on and save 7m. In 7 games Silega had 21 tackles with 23 assists and 2.5 sacks. That's my starting LDT. Backed up by Branch and a around 1-3 draft pick.

In an ESPN Insider article earlier this month advocating the "bold move" of the Pats cutting Wilfork, Andrew Healy noted:
As Pete Carroll decided whether to run or pass late in Super Bowl XLIX, he had little reason to fear Wilfork and the Patriots' short-yardage run defense. In 2014, the Patriots were the worst team in the league in Power Success [a Football Outsiders metric], allowing opposing offenses to convert 22 of 27 runs (81 percent) in important short-yardage situations (third or fourth down with 2 yards or less to go and first- or second-and-goal from the 2-yard-line or closer). Even the Patriots' few stops came against the league's worst running teams. Teams not ranking in the bottom quarter of the league in Football Outsiders' rushing DVOA ratings converted 16 of 17 chances (94 percent) against the Patriots' run defense.

http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/stor...iami-dolphins-new-york-jets-buffalo-bills-nfl

I'm not a huge FO fan, but I agree with the general point that the Pats' run defense up the middle was far from an immovable wall. I think it's very hard to be an "immovable wall" anyway - it's easier to get penetration and disrupt the rushing lanes, and that requires quicker guys inside.

Hardison has Sheldon Richardson-like quickness. Coach him up on his combat techniques, and I think he can be a terror inside as well as out.
 
Wilfork's size doesn't have to be replaced. He's an avg. player at best right now. He played over 70pct of our plays and had 28 tackles with 25 assists. He has no short-area quickness and quite simply can't get to the ball carrier to finish a play. Zero sacks. Zero forced or recovered fumbles. He got an int against Oak because he was unable to get off the LOS and the ball landed on his belly. Hate to be so blunt about him. Great guy. We need to move on and save 7m. In 7 games Silega had 21 tackles with 23 assists and 2.5 sacks. That's my starting LDT. Backed up by Branch and a around 1-3 draft pick.

Regarding the difficulty in replacing Wilfork's size, I keep thinking back to last year's top plugger, Louis Nix, lasting into the 3rd round.

Is that more a reflection on the player or a devaluing of pure run stuffers?
 
Last edited:
As Mike Loyko noted during the Combine:
Ali Marpet is the type of unheralded technician and battler that Dante Scarnecchia lusts over at night.

https://twitter.com/NEPD_Loyko/status/568813302027042818

For me, Marpet's Combine performance just solidified his athleticism to excel at the next level. He was already on my binky list (as was Hardison, who didn't work out at the Combine due to a foot injury):

http://www.patsfans.com/new-england...ot-of-the-2015-draft-and-value-picks.1117152/
 
Regarding the difficulty in replacing Wilfork's size, I keep thinking back to last year's top plugger, Louis Nix, lasting into the 4rd round.

Is that more a reflection on the player or a devaluing of pure run stuffers?

Nix went in the 3rd, but your point stands. And he didn't do well. Tony Pauline reports:
I’m told the Houston Texans are not happy with not happy with Louis Nix and will target a nose tackle during the draft.

http://www.draftinsider.net/blog/?p=10459
 
The decision on VW is pre
Regarding the difficulty in replacing Wilfork's size, I keep thinking back to last year's top plugger, Louis Nix, lasting into the 4rd round.

Is that more a reflection on the player or a devaluing of pure run stuffers?

And Nix is in danger of getting cut. It's important to be strong at the point of attack. It's just as important to have enough lateral agility to make the tackle or get a piece of him. VW can hold his ground. But, can't complete the play. You need that big mountain of a man at NG. But, we don't run much 3-4. A big 0/1 tech DT is still important. Doesn't have to be 350lb though. Goldman might be the best fit for that type of player.
 
This is a great thread and thanks for starting it Mayo. I think its important to TRY and think like the Pats think even though they usually end up thinking so differently in the end.

You offer a interesting scenario with Hardison and Marpet. Given that you hit my 2 personal position priorities on the nose I have to be happy. I am a big believer that finding IMPACT interior DLmen is the most difficult thing after QB. Unfortunately my belief is pretty universal, so any player who potentially fits that role is going to go well before we get to pick at #32. And guys who are currently under the radar, like Hardison, are more likely to be candidates for "reaches".

MAYBE, a more traditional run stopper like Goldman might fall to us, but right now he is generally being mocked higher. If Ngata leaves the Ravens, its not likely Goldman gets past them. If he does, you have to hope that he develops like Wilkerson, who was considered to be a 3-4 DE run stuffer in the mold of Ty Warren, but turned into so much more.

You envision a logical plan to acquire Marpet and Hardison. Personally I think Hardison's rare potential would push him closer to #45 than #62. Usually trading down would solve this problem, but in THIS year I'm a big believer in Quality over quantity, so what would we have to give up to get from 62 to 45? I'd give up 2 picks Would our 4th and 6th be enough?

So in my scenario we trade up to get Hardison, Marpet goes to us in the 3rd, who do you like with that "bonus" first round pick. I hate to say it, but Todd Gurley is starting to look appetizing, especially if there is no one else around that knocks your socks off. However every time I think on it, I cringe. RB's are just so risky, and for our offense, they don't have to be special, just solid.

As to Marpet, he is an intriguing prospect. I'm just wondering about your prediction that he could start day one. That's quite a jump from division 3 to starting in the NFL in 4 months. I really hope we draft him, but if we do, we are likely to need a starting LG in place to start the season.

IC makes an interesting comment about needed the beef to replace Vince. But I think run stoppers are more common and available. You can pick up a Branch type cheaply in FA, or throughout the draft. In today's game a great run stopper like Goldman might be too much of a luxury at #32,......unless you see disruption potential that isn't evident now.

Again great thread

Predicting where a guy will go in the draft is very, very hard. No one thought Louis Nix would drop to #83. No one thought Tyson Alualu would go #10.

Right now Hardison is still under the radar a bit. That could be an illusion, and it could also change if he blows away his pro day. It only takes 1 team. 45 seems like a reach at the moment, though I don't think it's a reach at all in terms of his ability. My hope right now would be to get Hardison and Marpet with #64 and 96, with possibly 1 trade up. But a lot can change between now and the draft.

Assuming we could get those 2 guys on day 2, our #32 pick would be a bit of a "luxury pick". Guys I could see targeting:

1. Todd Gurley. I think he's worth it. I've also been a big "don't draft a RB in the 1st" advocate, so he's the exception to my rule.

2. One of the EDGE players. Bud Dupree if he slips. Owamagbe Odighizuwa. Danielle Hunter with a trade back. I think Benardrick McKinney could be a Hightower kind of MLB/EDGE hybrid, again, with a trade back. Maybe Eli Harold of the Pats saw him as fit, though I don't personally see it.

3. An OT with versatility. TJ Clemmings would be my choice if he slips. RT and future LT. He would provide insurance if Solder can't be kept, or a long term replacement for Vollmer as an elite athletic RT. Jake Fisher (possibly with a trade back) would be my second choice. I have questions about Erving's ability to succeed at OT at the next level, otherwise he'd also be on the list.

4. Eddie Goldman if he slips. As I said above, a young DL nucleus of Goldman-Easley-Hardison would be pretty darn good.

5. A "wildcard" pick. Shaq Thompson as an all-purpose weapon, or a DB like Jalen Collins, Marcus Peters or Byron Jones. I believe in drafting to build a long-term talent base for the team, not to fill short-term needs.

Others would probably have a WR on the list, but (like you) I would not go that route. Manx would probably include Maxx Williams on the list, again, possibly with a trade back.

BTW, I'm gratified with the response to this thread. I wasn't sure it was worth a thread on its own - I don't rate my own personal opinion that highly - but it seems to have stimulated some good discussion.
 
Early in the process I was all for trading up but looking at how things have shaken out I think standing pat or trading back is the best option. I don't see a player that falls to 25 that you have to reach for. I would have said Goldman but I have read enough and seen enough tape on him to notice a few minor issues. I would love him at 32 but I don't think he is worth sacrificing a medium level pick for him that could be used on a solid player. Now if he falls within 1 or 2 picks I could see a minor trade but I don't want to give away a real asset.

He is the only guy I could see the Pats trading up to get. If he is gone and the Pats trade up for someone else no matter who it is (of the players that could reasonably be within the range of 6-7 picks) I would be fairly surprised.

I would really rather not take a guard in the first unless Connolly leaves and we can't get a good vet to replace him. The except is if you can get a guy like Zack Martin but I don't see him in this draft. Erving is good and versatile but not the player Martin is in my mind.

I agree with looking at positions as opposed to names in a draft like this except for the first round. I am like a few other poster on here not looking for an undersized DT. If Hardison is the best player than sure take him and work around it. I think something can be said for a guy who is more of a run stuffer though. That does not mean you need to be 340 lbs. Just if the DT in question is better vs the run than the pass I think that is fine. Particularly cause you have Easley and a guy of his talent should produce. Also I believe you have a good "Nascar package" with the guys you have. Just you don't get to see it very often cause BB is so focused on contain in a lot of situations. Obviously getting a guy that can do both at a high level be ideal but I don't think that is in the cards for this draft. Hope I'm wrong about that though.
 
Last edited:
Has there ever been so much agreement on binkies before? Between Hardison, Smelter, Marpet, Erving, it seems like we are close to group think on the guys we all want.

There are some individual guys outside of that, but if we walk away with even 2 of those guys, most everyone would be really happy it seems.
Does that mean the Pats draft those guys, lets all lock arms and squint real hard.
 
Donno why people keep talking about Cowboys and Martin. Cowboys used a top pick on a RIGHT GAURD. Not in my wildest imagination could I see Patriots and BB useing a top 50 pick on a RG. LT and LG, and I even question LG. I know they picked Mankins at 32. But I think that was more about security at LT ( like the Solder pick ) then getting a LG at 32.
 
Donno why people keep talking about Cowboys and Martin. Cowboys used a top pick on a RIGHT GAURD. Not in my wildest imagination could I see Patriots and BB useing a top 50 pick on a RG. LT and LG, and I even question LG. I know they picked Mankins at 32. But I think that was more about security at LT ( like the Solder pick ) then getting a LG at 32.

Could have been worse for the Cowboys. Reportedly the draft card that Jerry Jones wanted to hand in had Johnny Manziel's name on it.

His son had try pry it away and force him to make the Martin pick.
 
Again, we disagree, which is fine. I've been all over Cam Erving for 2 years now, and there's nothing that changes my opinion of him. I'd be fine if he ends up being the pick. But I think that Marpet is better and further along than you think.
I would be happy with Erving #1 and Marpet #2, to be honest. Connelly is a FA and likely to move on. Wendell would make a perfect backup at all three interior positions (and would likely start over Marpet in this scenario). Our backup interior guys aren't good enough although maybe Kline is OK as a backup.

If our OL could be Solder/Vollner with Connelly and Fleming as backups at Tackle, Erving/Marpet with Kline and Wendell at backups at Guard and Stork with Wendell at backup at Center we could have an intriguing group of starters (Solder, Erving, Stork, Marpet, Vollmer) with backups Cannon (Tackle), Flemming (T/G), Wendell (G/C), Kline (G).

That said, if we could trade #32 for a third round pick this year and a #1 next year I'm moving it.

We'd have two 3s (expected) and two 4s to get some DL.
 
It's easier to find guards in the 3-4 round area than defensive linemen. This year is no different.
 
That said, if we could trade #32 for a third round pick this year and a #1 next year I'm moving it.

We'd have two 3s (expected) and two 4s to get some DL.

Depending on who is on the board, I would be quite happy with that. Hopefully we could get Hardison and Marpet with the 2nd and higher third. Then we would have 96, a likely 3rd round comp, an early 4th, a late 4th and 2-3 late round picks to use. I think we could add some serious talent, especially if the team targets a couple of injured guys like Ogbuehi and Smelter. Definitely an option.

As a hypothetical example:

- Trade 32 to Atlanta for 73 and a 2016 1st.

64. Marcus Hardison, DT/DE, Arizona St.

73. Ali Marpet, OL, Hobart.

96. David Johnson, RB, Northern Iowa. Vereen/AHern hybrid with great receiving ability.

97 (comp). Cedric Ogbuehi, OL, Texas A&M. Could be a future starting tackle on either side, and a good swing tackle starting in 2016.

101 (TB). Ellis McCarthy, DL, UCLA. Bigger DT.

4. Tre McBride or Kenny Bell.

6 (TB). DeAndre Smelter, WR, Georgia Tech. Would likely get a red-shirt year.

6 (comp). Max Valles, EDGE, Virginia. I still like him.

7 (Tenn). Darren Waller, WR/TE, Georgia Tech. Big hybrid with excellent measurables.

I'd be quite content with that draft, plus an extra 2016 1st.
 
Maybe, but I don't think it will take as long as you think. Jahri Evans from Division II Bloomsburg (4th round, 2006) started all 16 games as a rookie. Jared Veldheer from Division II Hillsdale (3rd round, 2010) played in all 16 games as a rookie and started 11. Terron Amstead from Division II Arkansas-Pine Bluff (3rd round, 2013) became a full time starter in his 2nd year. I don't think the level of competition is that critical. Marpet showed at the Senior Bowl that he can adapt, and I think he will develop faster than you expect. Again, I could easily be wrong. But there are no guarantees. Jonathan Cooper was considered one of the safest and most NFL-ready prospects in the draft in 2013, and the Cardinals have gotten nothing from he for 2 years due to injury and slow recovery/development.


possibly, but you're counting on a really small data sample
 
Joel Klatt from Foxsports has a new post-Combine top 50 big board out.

http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/...t-version-3-022315?cmpid=tsmtw:fscom:nflonfox

Some interesting changes. For example, he drops Brandon Scherff from 8 to 17 and notes:
17. Brandon Scherff, OT, Iowa (8)

Love his aggressiveness and strength at the point of attack in the run game, and his nasty nature is something that every NFL O-line coach would love to have in his room. However, some serious questions have risen about his ability to play tackle in the NFL. His stock, which was as high as top five at one point, has dropped fast, and he will have to have great individual workouts to remain in the first round. For a big man, he moves easily and his athleticism should help in his development in pass protection.

He has TJ Clemmings at 49 and notes:
49. TJ Clemmings, OT, Pitt (NR)

Clemmings has bounced back a bit from a disastrous week in Mobile when he went from the potential top OT in the draft to off my Big Board altogether. He is athletic and intriguing, but I don't think it is going to be enough for him to get back up to the first round. His basketball background is a plus, but hasn't showed a tangible skill set that allows evaluators to project franchise-level OT play.

And he has Eddie Goldman at 34:
34. Eddie Goldman, DT, Florida State

Played both DE and DT in the past two seasons, and his ceiling is high. For a guy 320 pounds, he is a knee bender, which is rare, but that also leads to improved balance on the interior. Power is the name of the game here, and while he has lots of room for improvement rushing the passer, he can play against the run tomorrow in the NFL.

Byron Jones doesn't make his top 50.

I think there will be a lot of shaking out in the 1st round before all is said and done. Teams will have very, very different opinions on a lot of players.
 
I think it would be stupid for anyone to give a 2016 1st for the last pick in round 1 in 2015

I'd love to see it, but I think other teams have been smartening up lately.


To be clear I am not calling anyone stupid for suggesting it, but I think teams seem less willing to trade next year's 1st plus, for a 1st this year. It doesn't usually end well for them, but people with pressures of losing their jobs may make a panic move like this.
 
I like Hardison as an interior sub-rusher and Easley insurance, but he worries me against the run as well. From what I've seen of him, he doesn't hold up as well against double teams. But as an insurance plan for Easley, he works just fine. As for Marpet, I wouldn't say I like him as much as Erving, but I wouldn't be disappointed in the least if we took him. I think he could solify the LG position for years to come.
 


Patriots News 4-28, Draft Notes On Every Draft Pick
MORSE: A Closer Look at the Patriots Undrafted Free Agents
Five Thoughts on the Patriots Draft Picks: Overall, Wolf Played it Safe
2024 Patriots Undrafted Free Agents – FULL LIST
MORSE: Thoughts on Patriots Day 3 Draft Results
TRANSCRIPT: Patriots Head Coach Jerod Mayo Post-Draft Press Conference
2024 Patriots Draft Picks – FULL LIST
TRANSCRIPT: Patriots CB Marcellas Dial’s Conference Call with the New England Media
So Far, Patriots Wolf Playing It Smart Through Five Rounds
Wolf, Patriots Target Chemistry After Adding WR Baker
Back
Top