eom
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2007
- Messages
- 4,064
- Reaction score
- 1,487
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.If we only dress 3 RBs, White is the odd man out. Bolden too important on STs.I was going to say Brandon Bolden but then we don't usually suit up the 4th RB. So I agree with Brady6, it will be James White.
Fair enough, thank you.If we only dress 3 RBs, White is the odd man out. Bolden too important on STs.
Agreed, I'd rather sit White than Bolden, and use Slater. The added value of White is not worth sitting a much needed special teamer.If we only dress 3 RBs, White is the odd man out. Bolden too important on STs.
I was gonna suggest that but I didn't want to give Joker palpitations. Oh Danny Boy....Amendola was a good KR in STL.
Amendola was a good KR in STL.
Vereen is too valuable and has too many durability concerns in my opinion to risk as the KR.What about Shane Vereen?
I was gonna suggest that but I didn't want to give Joker palpitations. Oh Danny Boy....
I think that's a little overrated, do KRs really get hurt often returning kicks?That's a good point, Marqui--but I would prefer a player of lesser importance due to the fact that KOR are much more "violent" than punt returns.