This is what you orginally posted...
Biggest bust? Not even close, Tavon has already done more than Chad Jackson did in his career.
You didn't set the parameter at "well it only took him half a season", so I compared their numbers straight up. It's 3 TD's vs. 4 picks. Multiple picks were the ball being thrown, quite literally, right at him. After that, as you know, Wilson got benched. But if Wilson were to be cut prior to Week 1 this season, he would seal it as the bigger bust of the two because you'd have to take all that into account plus the fact that he would be the first 2nd round pick in the Belichick era on this team to be cut before his second season.
Sure it is. It tells you of their draft position vs. where they were going to go. If you think it's irrelevant then you must think that Wilson would still be considered a "bust" if he were drafted in say, the sixth or the seventh round. Where he was more than likely going to go if Belichick didn't go full ****** with that pick.
If we're going to bring up what it cost to get Jackson, then whether or not Wilson was a reach is fair game.
Just an observation and not really anything to do with the debate at hand, but I think it's somewhat amusing (if not sad due to the consequences it brings to the team) how the argument for Tavon has gone from the ferocity that it was after the 2012 draft to "he wouldn't be the biggest bust in the Belichick era", in one year. That alone should tell even the most casual fan how bad he looked in 2012 and should be a good lesson on why you can't simply take stats like that and post them without context.