what would rogers have done to us? - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums

***DarrylS*** · 12-20-2010, 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Consent

Rodgers not playing actually benefited the packs.n
Lack of quality film on Flynn made it difficult for BB to sufficiently prepare his guys.
I hope you didn't expect to just figure out a guy starting for the first time in the nfl.
If Peyton couldn't beat us, what made you think Rodgers would have?

Either did Rothlisberger, Flacco, Rivers et al.. we lost to Sanchez, McCoy and almost lost to Flynn..

No one can possible know how Rodgers would have done..

***Brady_to_Moss*** · 12-20-2010, 11:34 AM

I think Pats would have actually won by more if Rodgers played

Kid~Brady · 12-20-2010, 11:35 AM

You basically asked the question and answered it in the thread discription.

Its always harder when you don't know whats coming. Thats what makes the Pats so dangerous, we don't tweak plays, BB tweaks whole playbooks so other upcoming teams can't use that against us.

You don't want to hear whats obvious and true and you know that

ScottieC · 12-20-2010, 12:00 PM

Good teams find a way to win, so I would expect the same result - a close game and a Patriots Win.

What Rogers would have done? Who knows. But, It’s quite possible he would not have played as well as that kid last night.

You can say Rogers would not have thrown an INT, but then he would have done something that Manning, Rivers, Roethlisberger, Cutler, Farve, etc etc could not do - Not a good argument.

PatsFan2 · 12-20-2010, 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanAngeloState

I fear it would have been an incineration. And don't give me this "well there's tape on rogers so bb would have magically exploited him!".

What will rivers do if we are unfortunate enough to play them in the playoffs.
Luckily, that will be in NE, hopefully they've forgotten how to catch in the cold.

BB needs to address the DL. 4 regular contributors out? This is getting a little ridiculous!

The Chargers won't be in the Playoffs so you dont have to worry.

PaulThePat · 12-20-2010, 12:20 PM

What a dumb thread. Who cares what Rodgers would have done. Why does this matter to some people. We've beaten Payaton, Big Ben, Rivers and Lord Favrequad so who is to say we wouldn't have beaten Aaron ? Enjoy the win and stop worrying.

***patsfaninpittsburgh*** · 12-20-2010, 01:03 PM

Perhaps the best answer is from Packers fans. Look at their comments. The ones I reviewed have their fans complaining that MM only has Rogers throwing the ball.

Also, before the was nailed in the Lions game, Rogers was doing less than when Flynn came in.

The game was too much an oddity to judge.

***patsfaninpittsburgh*** · 12-20-2010, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanAngeloState

I fear it would have been an incineration. And don't give me this "well there's tape on rogers so bb would have magically exploited him!".

What will rivers do if we are unfortunate enough to play them in the playoffs.
Luckily, that will be in NE, hopefully they've forgotten how to catch in the cold.

BB needs to address the DL. 4 regular contributors out? This is getting a little ridiculous!

Has anybody told you that we went out to San Diego and beat the Chargers?

Seriously, it's amazing what some of you come up with.

Kid~Brady · 12-20-2010, 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PaulThePat

We've beaten Payaton.

Who the hell is that?

Kidding lol...