patchick

My roster keeps ending up with only 13 DLs/LBs, considering that:

- nickel/dime defenses will surely dominate
- Fletcher's out of the picture
- Pryor will be on PUP and Francis, Harrison & Forston are strong PS candidates
- DBs tend to drop like flies

I'm curious to hear other opinions. Here's my current roster, FWIW:


QB (3) Tom Brady, Ryan Mallett, Brian Hoyer
RB (4) Danny Woodhead, Stevan Ridley, Shane Vereen, Jeff Demps
WR (6) Wes Welker, Brandon Lloyd, Deion Branch, Matthew Slater, Julian Edelman, Jabar Gaffney
TE (3) Rob Gronkowski, Aaron Hernandez, Daniel Fells
C (2) Dan Connolly, Ryan Wendell
G (4) Logan Mankins, Brian Waters, Nick McDonald, Donald Thomas
T (4) Sebastian Vollmer, Nate Solder, Marcus Cannon, Darrion Weems
DE (4) Chandler Jones, Jake Bequette, Rob Ninkovich, Jermaine Cunningham
DT (4) Vince Wilfork, Kyle Love, Ron Brace, Brandon Deaderick
ILB(5) Jerod Mayo, Brandon Spikes, Donta Hightower, Bobby Carpenter, Jeff Tarpinian
OLB(0)
CB (6) Devin McCourty, Ras-I Dowling, Kyle Arrington, Sterling Moore, Alfonzo Dennard, Marquice Cole
SS (2) Patrick Chung, Nate Ebner
FS (2) Steve Gregory, Tavon Wilson
ST (3) Stephen Gostkowski, Zoltan Mesko, Danny Aiken

Total players: 52
Created with Pats Picker: Pats Picker 2012

DocHoliday

I love it. Great job

__________________

Armchair Quarterback

Harrison is not PS eligible, I think those three (Harrison, Forston, Francis) might be fighting for the final spot.

I'd have Bolden on the team and Weems off.

patchick

Whoops, thanks, I had Harrison's resume confused with a player from last year's camp. If you do add one of those three, who would you cut?

That was exactly my final back-and-forth choice. I like Bolden's potential a lot, but looking at both the Patriots' roster and the league in general this year, a spare RT is looking awfully valuable.

Sicilian

I'd keep Trevor Scott, but beyond that I can't see anyone else poised to make this team beyond what you listed. Possible we could add someone after other teams make their cuts, but based on who we have now I see 14.

signbabybrady

Just for starters when coming up with numbers I generally like to back up each position. As it looks like we prominantly 4-3 thats 8 DL and 6 LBs for a total of 14 in the front seven. You want more and you are borrowing from another position. Also I like to consider Nickle and 3rd WRs as starters so I do admit that backing up every position means 24 on D and 24 on O only leaving 5 spots 3 of which are the K, P and LS. So based on my logic that only leaves 2 STs spots and Slater has one of them so after backing up each spot and accounting for STers there is one remaining spot and at least 3 positions where we would seemingly want an extra body(TE,RB,Safety, STers)

I could see going with 13 like the OP suggests as there are several positions on this team where we may want to carry an extra body. Carrying 13 in the front seven can be afforded as Carter is still out there and Warren I believe has said he is finishing his career here plus I think we can get a couple of front seven guys to the practice squad like Tarp or Rivera.

__________________

Armchair Quarterback

You only had 52 on your roster so no cuts necessary.

I might be the only one thinking this but I'm not sold on Vereen at all. Bolden can back up Ridley for the lead back role. Vereen can fight it out with Demps, who's already shown the explosiveness Vereen hasn't and Woodhead who's proven to be an effective 3rd down back.

While I agree that a capable tackle would be a valuable addition, I don't think Weems is it. Maybe a trade or a waiver claim.

Other than Bolden /Weems and the 53rd spot I have the same roster.

mgteich

I would point out that three weeks ago it was critical for most here to have SIXTEEN front seven players. I believe 13 is fewer than we have ever kept. BTW, who is your 53rd player?

1) I think that we need at least one more in the front seven. Either Scott or Warren works for me.

2) I am not sure about about Tarpinian. To be one of the 13 or 14, he needs to add to more to the defense than Scott and Warren. Perhaps he does and should be kept instead of Scott. belichick will judge. The 13th and 14th roster front seven positions are NOT a special teams positions. I believe that #15 and #16 are special teams positions.

3) I'm OK with giving one of the front seven ST positions to Cole instead of a front seven player.

4) We need another safety. The only carryover from 2011 is the oft-injured Chung. I would keep Ihedigbo over Dennard. We just can't afford a developmental player who hasn't practiced much on a 23 or 24 man defensive squad.

5) On the offense, I think that Weems is a placeholder for the OT, we hope to sign from other teams' cuts. Also, Koppen may still make the team over Wendell or MacDonald.

So, compared to you,

IN: Scott, Warren, Ihedigbo
OUT: Tarpinian, Dennard

patchick

Boy, you'd think the big "52/53" at the top of the Pats Picker would have tipped me off!

Well that certainly is handy. I see 4+ candidates for the final slot:

Scott
Harrison
Forston
Bolden
and maybe Shiancoe

I could also easily picture a player like Weems being on the "delayed Turk" plan -- surviving the cut for just a day or two to increase the chances that he clears to the PS, then getting booted off in favor of a pickup from another team's final cuts.

Armchair Quarterback

Warren has already been cut.
Dennard's potential should keep him on the team.
I doubt Koppen makes the team over Wendell or McDonald but could see him make it over Weems.
Tarpinian, I'm kind of indifferent about but they'll need a 5th LB either way.