ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
what the hell is this ? the media is really going after this more than steroid abuse and all.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
what the hell is this ? the media is really going after this more than steroid abuse and all.
Consider the source. I saw "Florio" on the byline of the linked article, shook my head, and looked away.
__________________
“I'm tired of hearing about money, money, money, money, money. I just want to play the game, drink Pepsi, wear Reebok…”
-Shaquille O'Neal
what the hell is this ? the media is really going after this more than steroid abuse and all.
"The possibility exists . . ."
Other usages of that phrase include:
The possibility exists that Mike Florio lit squirrels on fire as a child.
The possibility exists that Mike Florio will spontaneously combust tomorrow.
The possibility exists that Mike Florio likes "it" the Osi Umenyiora way.
etc.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Please. This is an author attempting to fit a round peg into a square hole when asked what interest the federal government could have in taping a walk-through to give the alleged violation a weighty consequence.
With all the heat the DOJ has on it right now, does it really want to take up a dicey criminal prosecution of a football coach based on a crack head's statement? The law is not even close to clear that this is even possible, but it makes for good drama.
first of all, this is nonsense and we are all (myself included) foolish for wasting our time worrying about it.
in addition, heh heh, we should all be lawyers, that's where the money is. as far as i know, what constitutes a "trade secret" is relatively loosely defined, the infringment of which would have to be tied directly and specifically to some monetary benefit or loss. so, in this case, someone (the Rams organization) would have to show specific harm as a result of the patriots' illicit foreknowledge of a specific play in a specific situation. i'm sure that there are a bunch of lawyers who could make a nice meal out of that, but i don't think it goes anywhere in this case.
__________________
It is what it is. It wasn't what it wasn't.
Last edited by PatsFanSince74; 02-06-2008 at 03:56 PM..
first of all, this is nonsense and we are probably foolish for wasting our time worrying about it.
We waste our time worrying about a lot of foolish nonsense around here, haha. How else are we supposed to fill the days now that the season is over and the draft is still months away?
__________________
“I'm tired of hearing about money, money, money, money, money. I just want to play the game, drink Pepsi, wear Reebok…”
-Shaquille O'Neal
first of all, this is nonsense and we are all (myself included) foolish for wasting our time worrying about it.
in addition, heh heh, we should all be lawyers, that's where the money is. as far as i know, what constitutes a "trade secret" is relatively loosely defined, the infringment of which would have to be tied directly and specifically to some monetary benefit or loss. so, in this case, someone (the Rams organization) would have to show specific harm as a result of the patriots' illicit foreknowledge of a specific play in a specific situation. i'm sure that there are a bunch of lawyers who could make a nice meal out of that, but i don't think it goes anywhere in this case.
i think the pats welcome a complete investigation. i doubt the nfl does.
__________________
john clayton is super chicken and doug gottlieb is a thief .
i think the pats welcome a complete investigation. i doubt the nfl does.
that's an interesting point and one that i hadn't heard before. you might be onto something there. if there is nothing more to tell about the patriots (and, that increasingly seems to be the truth), then any investigation would only serve to expose the extent of cheating by other teams.
__________________
It is what it is. It wasn't what it wasn't.