Rob0729

A general theme on Jets boards this week is that the Pats' defense sucks, but they create a lot of turnovers. As if creating turnovers are easy and any defense can create turnovers. There is even a thread where the OP goes a step further and claims the offense isn't really all that great either and just benefit from extra possessions from the turnovers.

Correct me if I am wrong, but I think it takes talent for a defense to create 36 defense in a season.

Sicilian

Funny... people tend to take credit away from the defense because of all the pressure that our offense puts on opposing QBs... now they're dissing the offense because the defense is setting them up with turnovers.

So... somehow both our offense AND defense suck, meaning our ST have won us 14 games.

mgcolby

Complimentary football.

__________________
Hey, Bill you're wasting Brady's prime years......oh wait....
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

seven

The Flip side, or next step in this one:
The D always has the luxury of big leads.

Random deflections off Rvrs. hands would certainly be luck.
This +28 is not that.

1) We have seen it. they have not.
As in the attacks on Gronk, to Branch is JAG, etc.
People must have not watched the team. They couldn't have.
Perhaps read down the unfamiliar names on the roster, look at the stats.

2) More casual Fans tend to see INTs as random accidentals,
equivalent to a fumble as 'dropping the ball' and
Not recognize they are a function of coaching, discipline, teaching
ball hawking hustle, and using multiple well designed D schemes/formations,
that lead to QB confusion.

3) (subset of 2), talented men in the secondary, making plays.
This contradicts their own faulty premise it is all B/BB.

45-3




More stumpers:

The receivers aren't that good, they just catch all the passes
because of Brady.

Brady is not that great, it is Belichick.

Belichick is not that great it is, Brady.

If the pats didn't score 30 ppg, they wouldn't win by as much.

If woodhead is so good, why did the Jets waive him?

How can they win with rookies? Who wins with rookies?
***********


My own humble contribution.
If Brady was a Raider, would Adipose Rex suddenly crave
a woman with breasts?

brady199

A team that lives off of big turnovers, can be hit or miss. You can't expect to get them every game as opposed to a Defense that shuts you down. You would feel better that a shutdown defense would show up more consistantly. With that said there really aren't any shutdown defenses and the ones who thought they were didn't feel the same way after they faced Brady this year.

But I like the chances of creating turnovers against Mark Sanchez in cold weather. Sunday looks like a high of 34 degrees.

ctpatsfan77

Which is bull, because (excluding take-a-knee drives) the Patriots had the FEWEST possessions of any team in the NFL in 2010.

FOOTBALL OUTSIDERS: Innovative Statistics, Intelligent Analysis | 2010 DRIVE STATS

__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

seven

I would expect some revisiting of this, given it combines Uggs, feet, Sanchez in the cold, and generally seems stranger than fiction. Some scribe, stumped for a plotline, i would think?

UGG! Sanchez gets special cold-weather helmet

UGG! Sanchez gets special cold-weather helmet
3:14 PM, December 18, 2009 ASSOCIATED PRESS

Mark Sanchez will wear a special cold-weather helmet to play his first career game in temperatures under 40 degrees.

“We put some of the UGG boot stuff in his helmet, so he’s going to be warmer,” Rex Ryan said, referring to the wool-lined footwear. “I’m not kidding. Look at his helmet. He’s got some of that in there. We try to make sure our guys are comfortable and healthy and protected.”

"I am excited to play. I know there are going to be many more (games in the snow), so I plan to get used to it," Sanchez said.

jmt57

What may be the most worn-out cliché used by football analysts in their weekly pre-game 'keys to the game' is that "the team that wins the turnover battle will win this game", "this team must win the turnover battle", or something similar. The only response most people have to comments such as those is that saying that is stating the obvious; you may as well say the key to the game is to score more points.

With that in mind I find it ironic that now some are trying to say turnovers are random acts of pure luck that cannot be counted on or expected to happen.

Why stats like 3rd down defense or rushing yards allowed per game are thrown out as some be-all end-all stat, but turnovers are dismissed as meaningless boggles my mind. Other than points scored and points allowed, turnovers may be the most important stat out there; it's certainly more telling than offensive and defensive yards per game in my opinion.

ctpatsfan77

It may not be causative, but TO margin sure as heck is correlative:

Just considering 2010 regular season games:

Team TO margin of +1: 66-27 (71%)
Team TO margin of +2: 49-10 (83%)
Team TO margin of +3 or better: 57-3 (95%)

__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

ATippett56

Jets fans need an education. Why don't you post this on one of their feeble websites:

Cold, Hard Football Facts.com: The Almighty CHFF Interception Ladder

Unfortunately, at least half of Jets Nation is illiterate.

__________________
The End of the Chad Ochostinko Era!