pearlcitypatriot

His Top 5 are:

1. Colts
2. Pats
3. Steelers
4. Green Bay
5. Dallas

lmao

pats63

he is a dumba-s.....GO PATS!!!!

VJCPatriot

Did he post this top 5 AFTER the Pats beat the Colts? If so, he is indeed retarded, oh excuse me, mentally challenged.

__________________

patsox23

Could be he's one of those who considers the Super Bowl champs #1 no matter what. That said, there's lots of other reasons to call him "just plain dumb."

chunkypony

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
....

HaHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAHAHAHAH

RPCity

I heard somebody say that they would have "considered the Pats better than the Colts even if they had lost a close game" last night, so maybe that's what Hodge's position is. The difference here is that this game was played in Indy, which gave indy all the advantages.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



This is all that I care about.

----------------------------------------

BB: "In New England, all we do is win Super Bowls."

DGameguy

I just saw him with Schlereth on ESPNNEWS and he was singing New England's praise. Said he thinks they will go 16-0, and that he really wants to see them go 16-0. So, maybe it was something posted previously.

Although, he did have a numbe rof concussion when playing

__________________
Gregg Easterbrook is an anti-Semite and Tony Maz is an idiot.

Tree huggin' blogger, please!

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

onegameatatime

I'm shocked it was not

1. Steelers
2. Colts
3. Pats

Aqua4Ever04

I really don't find it that insane. Just because the Patriots beat the Colts doesn't mean they are automatically the better team. If the Colts have Harrison, Keiaho and Gonzalez in the 2nd half that might be a pretty different game.

With that said, I think the Pats are the better team, but it's not as crazy as you guys make it sound.

List seems pretty alright to me, I'd change the Colts and Pats and that's about it.

Ahriman

And if the referees were, at the very least, competent then the Pats would've had an easy 10-14 point victory. I think people are forgetting how much of a fluke it was that Indy even scored 20 points. A 70 yard touchdown on a 3 yard dump off in which the Pats secondary suddenly turned into the Keystone Cops for a play? And at least one of those field goals is directly due to a horrible call.

I think people are wanting to say the Colts could've won that game with an extra healthy player here or there, but those same people are operating under the assumption that the Patriots played up to their capabilities and didn't have outside hindrances (the refs).

__________________
"I have a microscope and my microscope is very big." - Randy Moss