ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Re: Chad Jackson compared to 1st 10 2006 WR draft picks
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIP#40
Too early to say what? That Jennings is having a great rookie year so far? Too early to say that the Pats should go after Porter now? Or too early to say that Jackson will not be our #1 this season?
Greg Jennings IS having a great rookie year. Chad Jackson may NOT be our #1 this season. What I don't see is your argument nor am I seeing what you're surprised about. And in regards to the Porter situation, I'm sure BB knows much more than you, my friend. Believe it or not, BB does know something about football and he does knwo something about the Patriots. So relax.
Am I wrong in thinking that most people here realized that rookie WR's rarely flourish in their first year?
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The Colts shock and awe offense ... was shockingly awful." - quote from NFL Game Of The Week (2005 div vs Indy)
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: Chad Jackson compared to 1st 10 2006 WR draft picks
Quote:
Originally Posted by skri65
Greg Jennings IS having a great rookie year. Chad Jackson may NOT be our #1 this season. What I don't see is your argument nor am I seeing what you're surprised about. And in regards to the Porter situation, I'm sure BB knows much more than you, my friend. Believe it or not, BB does know something about football and he does knwo something about the Patriots. So relax.
Am I wrong in thinking that most people here realized that rookie WR's rarely flourish in their first year?
you are correct in everything you said..... people need to chill out and give players time. people who expected Jackson to be our #1 or #2 right away dont know football or the way that the patriots are built and operate. people who expect him to be that and a gamebreaker starting next season have their expectations correct and if he doesnt start contributing more then will have reason to b#$ch
__________________
Belichick on building a dynasty
"Really all we're trying to do is win a game here."
Re: Chad Jackson compared to 1st 10 2006 WR draft picks
[QUOTE=skri65]
Take a step back and breathe for a second. Please. I"m beginning to get tired of Chad Jackson complains.
How did my original post saying that many on this board are judging CJ too harshly and he compares favorably to most of the WR's taken in this past draft turn into a complaint about CJ?
Most rookies don't.
Most rookie WR's don't have good 1st seasons but most of the ones that turn out to be great do,
T. Owens 520 yds, R. Moss 1313 yds 17 td's, T. Holt 788 yds, A. Boldin 1377 yds. keyshawn 844 yds, jerry rice 927 yds, tim Brown 725 yds, marvin Harrison 836 yds .
Re: Chad Jackson compared to 1st 10 2006 WR draft picks
Quote:
Originally Posted by PonyExpress
Many people were high on Jennings at draft time. However, Jennings is 5'11 195 with average speed, and I believe the Pats are gambling that CJ can be a special, game-breaking player. Jennings is at least 2 years older than Jackson and played his full 4 years of college. Everyone knew he was more of a finished product. Too early to make judgments.
I love your 6 months later scouting reports. Can you please direct me to the post you made during draft time when you say everyone knew Jennings was more of a finished product? Thanks. If not, shut up because you don't know anything about Greg Jennings. My guess is you never even saw him play in college and if you did, it was once so spare us the Mel Kiper after the fact breakdown.
__________________
Go F*** yourself New England.
- Borges' profound message to Pats fans after he's fired from the Globe.
Re: Chad Jackson compared to 1st 10 2006 WR draft picks
Jennings has had a good season so far. There things that help. He played in a similar offense in college, and he played Z, X, and Zebra, so he came in with a good understanding of all three positions, which one of the biggest things that limits rookie WRs.
He's mature for his age.
He ran a 4.42 40-yard dash at the NFL combine. When did that become average?
Re: Chad Jackson compared to 1st 10 2006 WR draft picks
You're right... he was supposed to have average speed, then shocked everybody at the combine... sorry. I loved this kid. He plays like Deion Branch, he catches passes like he started in the cradle, and seems to have fun on the field. Would have been happy with him as a Pat. Interestingly, I believe he was drafted with our original 2nd rd selection, which we traded to GB to move up for Jackson. He played big in big games (Virginia and Michigan St, I believe). Obviously the Pats wanted to go in another direction and it's too early to make judgments...
Re: Chad Jackson compared to 1st 10 2006 WR draft picks
I'm going to compile a list of all these negative nancies who are "off the Chad Jackson bandwagon". When he turns into an elite wide receiver, I'm going to come back and expose all the folks who were too impatient to wait until at least midseason to make a judgment on the guy.