T.O would take less for us... - Page 5 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-15-2010, 09:35 PM   #41
In the Starting Line-up
 
pherein's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: N.O. and Virginia
Posts: 2,561
Blog Entries: 1
Default Re: T.O would take less for us...

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
Agreed. The Cowboys just didn't know how to win and have a terrible coaching staff (after Parcells left).

If I'm not mistaken, the Saints didn't have many guys out or anybody too significant. The Cowboys beat them straight up and showed they can match up with them. However, the Cowboys struggle against strong pass rushers like the Vikings D-line.

As far as the Eagles go, one center does not cripple your entire offense. In fact, it's a cop out. The Cowboys were the best team in the division in 2009 and look to be the best team in the division for the next few years.

If the Cowboys can avoid the Vikings, they have a very good chance of making the super bowl.
just FYI

and we lost by 4pts by a sack on the cowboy 34. Cowboys could never beat the Saints full strength. Now the Packers are a good team and another story. We wanted the Cowboys for the playoffs, so we could wipe them of the face of the earth for all the bragging they did after beating 1/2 of our starting team.

Saints vs Cowboys

Saints: DNP:
DT Sedrick Ellis (knee),
CB Jabari Greer (groin).
T Jermon Bushrod (thumb),
G Jahri Evans (foot),
LB Scott Fujita (knee),
C Jonathan Goodwin (ankle),
K Garrett Hartley (right hip),
DE Bobby McCray (back),
LB Marvin Mitchell (hamstring),
G Carl Nicks (back),
CB Tracy Porter (knee),
TE Jeremy Shockey (toe),
T Jon Stinchcomb (knee),
RB Pierre Thomas (hip),
LB Jonathan Vilma (knee),
S Usama Young (hip)
RB Mike Bell (wrist, knee),
WR Lance Moore (ankle, hamstring)
S Darren Shaper ( ankle )Limited play

Last edited by pherein; 07-15-2010 at 09:47 PM..
pherein is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 07-15-2010, 09:43 PM   #42
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
Elijah's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Pioneer Valley
Posts: 1,643
Default Re: T.O would take less for us...

Quote:
Originally Posted by pherein View Post
just FYI

Saints vs Cowboys
and we lost by 4pts by a sack on the cowboy 34. Cowboys could never beat us full strength. Now the Packers are a good team and another story.

Saints: DNP:
DT Sedrick Ellis (knee),
CB Jabari Greer (groin).
T Jermon Bushrod (thumb),
G Jahri Evans (foot),
LB Scott Fujita (knee),
C Jonathan Goodwin (ankle),
K Garrett Hartley (right hip),
DE Bobby McCray (back),
LB Marvin Mitchell (hamstring),
G Carl Nicks (back),
CB Tracy Porter (knee),
TE Jeremy Shockey (toe),
T Jon Stinchcomb (knee),
RB Pierre Thomas (hip),
LB Jonathan Vilma (knee),
S Usama Young (hip)
RB Mike Bell (wrist, knee),
WR Lance Moore (ankle, hamstring)
S Darren Shaper ( ankle )Limited play
Whoa...quite the list of injuries.
Elijah is online now  
Old 07-15-2010, 09:51 PM   #43
In the Starting Line-up
 
pherein's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: N.O. and Virginia
Posts: 2,561
Blog Entries: 1
Default Re: T.O would take less for us...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
Whoa...quite the list of injuries.
yea, we were messed up by that point.lol Cowboys didn't beat anyone that day.

Last edited by pherein; 07-15-2010 at 09:51 PM..
pherein is offline  
Old 07-15-2010, 10:15 PM   #44
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,498
My Mood: Cool
Default Re: T.O would take less for us...

Quote:
Originally Posted by pherein View Post
just FYI

and we lost by 4pts by a sack on the cowboy 34. Cowboys could never beat the Saints full strength. Now the Packers are a good team and another story. We wanted the Cowboys for the playoffs, so we could wipe them of the face of the earth for all the bragging they did after beating 1/2 of our starting team.

Saints vs Cowboys

Saints: DNP:
DT Sedrick Ellis (knee),
CB Jabari Greer (groin).
T Jermon Bushrod (thumb),
G Jahri Evans (foot),
LB Scott Fujita (knee),
C Jonathan Goodwin (ankle),
K Garrett Hartley (right hip),
DE Bobby McCray (back),
LB Marvin Mitchell (hamstring),
G Carl Nicks (back),
CB Tracy Porter (knee),
TE Jeremy Shockey (toe),
T Jon Stinchcomb (knee),
RB Pierre Thomas (hip),
LB Jonathan Vilma (knee),
S Usama Young (hip)
RB Mike Bell (wrist, knee),
WR Lance Moore (ankle, hamstring)
S Darren Shaper ( ankle )Limited play
Ultimately, it doesn't matter who you play, but when you play them - alot like the Arizona Cardinals in their 2008 playoff run. When Ken Wisenhunt decided to run a balanced attack instead of airing it out 50 X's a game, that's when the Cardinals made that playoff run at the end of the year(only to come up short in the Super Bowl).
__________________
Scott A. Johnson - End Times Current Events and Bible Study

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
DisgruntledTunaFan is offline  
Old 07-15-2010, 10:31 PM   #45
In the Starting Line-up
 
pherein's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: N.O. and Virginia
Posts: 2,561
Blog Entries: 1
Default Re: T.O would take less for us...

Quote:
Originally Posted by DisgruntledTunaFan View Post
Ultimately, it doesn't matter who you play, but when you play them - alot like the Arizona Cardinals in their 2008 playoff run. When Ken Wisenhunt decided to run a balanced attack instead of airing it out 50 X's a game, that's when the Cardinals made that playoff run at the end of the year(only to come up short in the Super Bowl).
Totally agree DisgruntledTunaFan, dont forget to add to that list the Patriots vs Ravens, you guys were pretty banged up by that point. I dont think a fully healthy Ravens beat a fully healthy Patriots. Just my take.
pherein is offline  
Old 07-15-2010, 11:27 PM   #46
In the Starting Line-up
 
West Philly Patriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,239
My Mood: Brooding
Default Re: T.O would take less for us...

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
As far as the Eagles go, one center does not cripple your entire offense. In fact, it's a cop out.
Yea? kinda how losing neal didnt cripple our offense in the game that shall not be named... I think losing your anchor on the o-line no matter what position causes a domino effect whether it's RG or C you win and lose games in the trenches.

jus my 0.02
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

"Whoever said, 'It's not whether you win or lose that counts,' probably lost." -Martina Navratilova
West Philly Patriot is offline  
Old 07-15-2010, 11:40 PM   #47
Banned
 
HEY BRO! WHAT UP?'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 4,370
Default Re: T.O would take less for us...

Quote:
Originally Posted by pherein View Post
just FYI

and we lost by 4pts by a sack on the cowboy 34. Cowboys could never beat the Saints full strength. Now the Packers are a good team and another story. We wanted the Cowboys for the playoffs, so we could wipe them of the face of the earth for all the bragging they did after beating 1/2 of our starting team.
Wow, my bad.

Quote:
Originally Posted by West Philly Patriot View Post
Yea? kinda how losing neal didnt cripple our offense in the game that shall not be named... I think losing your anchor on the o-line no matter what position causes a domino effect whether it's RG or C you win and lose games in the trenches.

jus my 0.02
Cop out. That what it is. What lost that game against the Giants was the Pats going insane and kept running plays that weren't working. They gave up on the run which may have at least slowed down the Giants'. Instead, they kept running plays that took two long to develop until the 4th quarter when they dink and dunked their way to a TD.

Last edited by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?; 07-15-2010 at 11:41 PM..
HEY BRO! WHAT UP? is offline  
Old 07-19-2010, 10:23 AM   #48
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
goheels22002's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Framingham, MA
Posts: 2,746
Default Re: T.O would take less for us...

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
Wow, my bad.


Cop out. That what it is. What lost that game against the Giants was the Pats going insane and kept running plays that weren't working. They gave up on the run which may have at least slowed down the Giants'. Instead, they kept running plays that took two long to develop until the 4th quarter when they dink and dunked their way to a TD.
That is exactly right. The blitz-happy Giants came from everywhere all game at that line and backfield. The 2003-2004 Pats would have said, meet my little friend Cory Dillon and his running buddies Patrick Pass and Kevin Faulk. A little smash-mouth blocking and running would have opened up the passing game but the Pats kept running those complex patterns that weren't working like they had against the Redskins.

Neal would have helped but a better game plan would have won it.
goheels22002 is offline  
Old 07-19-2010, 10:30 AM   #49
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
signbabybrady's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Foxboro
Posts: 8,319
My Mood: Buzzed
Default Re: T.O would take less for us...

Quote:
Originally Posted by goheels22002 View Post
That is exactly right. The blitz-happy Giants came from everywhere all game at that line and backfield. The 2003-2004 Pats would have said, meet my little friend Cory Dillon and his running buddies Patrick Pass and Kevin Faulk. A little smash-mouth blocking and running would have opened up the passing game but the Pats kept running those complex patterns that weren't working like they had against the Redskins.

Neal would have helped but a better game plan would have won it.
This just made me think of what the 2007 patriots would have looked like with a 2004 Corey Dillon on the team
__________________
"We go down to New Orleans, and ain't anybody give us a chance? Nobody! And what did we say to them?"

"DON'T TALK TO ME!!!"
signbabybrady is online now  
Old 07-19-2010, 10:44 AM   #50
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
MoLewisrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 19,949
Default Re: T.O would take less for us...

Quote:
Originally Posted by goheels22002 View Post
That is exactly right. The blitz-happy Giants came from everywhere all game at that line and backfield. The 2003-2004 Pats would have said, meet my little friend Cory Dillon and his running buddies Patrick Pass and Kevin Faulk. A little smash-mouth blocking and running would have opened up the passing game but the Pats kept running those complex patterns that weren't working like they had against the Redskins.

Neal would have helped but a better game plan would have won it.
It's tough to game plan for a 2004 Corey Dillon when you haven't had that guy on the roster since 2004...let alone when Faulk gets dinged up and your 3rd stringer is BLGE because you lost Morris halfway through the season. And had Neal been out back then...but he wasn't. Just like he wasn't out when we FINALLY took the field after the defense gave up a FG on the longest drive in Superbowl history and scored a TD. Once Neal left the game the Giants front 4 rush found it's footing and it was effective no matter what we tried...
MoLewisrocks is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC