ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
That's a pretty big advantage for the Patriots across the board. Doubled the Ravens (thereabouts) in every major category: plays, yards, and points. The Patriots were moving the ball, while the Ravens did so on only one possession.
And then we start the third quarter, and it's more of the same for Baltimore:
6 plays, 25 yds, 2:14
Followed by New England's first drive, which wasn't great, but was better than Baltimore's:
7 plays, 33 yds, 2:43
So with 10:03 left in the 3rd quarter, the Patriots had thoroughly outplayed Baltimore for 35 full minutes:
That was a totally dominant 13:50 by the Ravens. After that, the Patriots actually got things going again. They continually had trouble actually scoring points, but they really started moving the ball once again. Over the last 11:13 of the game, here's what each team produced:
New England: 20 plays, 135 yds, 4:13, 2 turnovers
Baltimore: 15 plays, 23 yds, 6:52
So for 35 minutes plus 11 minutes = 46 minutes, the Patriots outplayed the Ravens (except the 2 TOs, which were huge):
So for 3/4 of the game, the Patriots moved the ball at will against Baltimore. They just made a few crucial errors and just could not, for the life of them, get it into the end zone.
And for that other 1/4 of the game, the Ravens completely dominated, and it was in that crucial 14 minute span that they did what they needed to do to win the game.
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
That's a pretty big advantage for the Patriots across the board. Doubled the Ravens (thereabouts) in every major category: plays, yards, and points. The Patriots were moving the ball, while the Ravens did so on only one possession.
And then we start the third quarter, and it's more of the same for Baltimore:
6 plays, 25 yds, 2:14
Followed by New England's first drive, which wasn't great, but was better than Baltimore's:
7 plays, 33 yds, 2:43
So with 10:03 left in the 3rd quarter, the Patriots had thoroughly outplayed Baltimore for 35 full minutes:
That was a totally dominant 13:50 by the Ravens. After that, the Patriots actually got things going again. They continually had trouble actually scoring points, but they really started moving the ball once again. Over the last 11:13 of the game, here's what each team produced:
New England: 20 plays, 135 yds, 4:13, 2 turnovers
Baltimore: 15 plays, 23 yds, 6:52
So for 35 minutes plus 11 minutes = 46 minutes, the Patriots outplayed the Ravens (except the 2 TOs, which were huge):
So for 3/4 of the game, the Patriots moved the ball at will against Baltimore. They just made a few crucial errors and just could not, for the life of them, get it into the end zone.
And for that other 1/4 of the game, the Ravens completely dominated, and it was in that crucial 14 minute span that they did what they needed to do to win the game.
In a tight game, the Ravens had 3 consecutive TD drives covering a total of 197 yards.
They faced one 3rd down. They ran for 11 yards on 3rd and 2 on it.
You just aren't going to win games if you let a team drive for 3 straight TDS without even putting up a fight.
It would be hard to find 3 consecutive drives of worse defense in any game.
As you illustrate, aside from that (and breakdowns on 3rd and short on offense) we did control the game.
Yup, the failure to perform inside the Raven's 35 yard line, the loss of Talib, and that terrible hit that caused the fumble were what led to this 14 minute scoring feast.
Yeah, I had the same feeling too. You can't settle for field goals, especially in a game where a super bowl berth is on the line. I thought the Patriots dominated the game early too, yet only got 13 points at halftime but should have been 17 or even 21 or whatever it could be. That was really encouraging for the Ravens that they were only down 13-7 and I think it may have given them confidence in the 2nd half.
The loss of Talib was huge, as the defense was doing great until he got injured. The secondary was just in a house of cards.
In a tight game, the Ravens had 3 consecutive TD drives covering a total of 197 yards.
They faced one 3rd down. They ran for 11 yards on 3rd and 2 on it.
You just aren't going to win games if you let a team drive for 3 straight TDS without even putting up a fight.
It would be hard to find 3 consecutive drives of worse defense in any game.
As you illustrate, aside from that (and breakdowns on 3rd and short on offense) we did control the game.
I think you're putting it a little too lightly. The defense was absolutely pathetic on those drives.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
the defeat took 1 second........or whatever time it took to decide to punt from the ravens 34 in the 3rd quarter......that sequence of downs
1st and 10 - deep incompletion to AH
2nd and 10 - 2 yard run by woodhead
3rd and 8 - incompletion to WW
4th and 8 - punt
that's when the toaster popped.......you had fresh legs in ridley and vereen.......but go with woodhead?
the only redeeming thing to do at 1st and 10 was to pound it with ridley or use vereens speed.....each down
__________________ “ I think good coaches will coach with the personnel they have, and if you only have one (good) linebacker, you’re not going to play a 3–4. ”
—Hank Bullough, who installed one of the first 3–4 defenses with the New England Patriots.