Benjamin Brady
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2013
- Messages
- 60
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Cut Jenkins or Jones, keep Edelman and Slater.
They're gone already. Trying to keep Moe.
Personally,I would prefer Curly or Shemp over Moe
Slater is closer to 43 than 53. You simply don't understand the importance of STers,
Slater is closer to 43 than 53. You simply don't understand the importance of STers,
I would need to know how good the 2nd best gunner and 2nd best PR on STs was before cutting either one. I suspect they're both, especially Slater, markedly better than their next best threat.
No I get it bro and I don't disagree but I'm asking if it came down to Edelman or Slater for the final roster spot who would you take? I think they're both above average ST players.
Its not going to though, and its not even going to come close. So its a silly question to ask.
Slater has not been used on offense too often...I think he struggles to learn the offense because you would think on a WR roster that was not deep in the past,he would crack the lineup more often.
Every year with this nonsense. Barring injury, Slater is a lock to make this team, just like he has been every year since he was drafted. And even though they are nominally the same position, comparing them is apples and oranges.
An equally (un)sensible post: Ridley or Washington spot 53?
I'm sorry buddy I didn't think it was silly and I was just looking for some feedback from some of my fellow members.
I get this, but the title of this thread isn't "Slater or Edelman - Pick One," it's "Slater or Edelman spot 53?" And I think a majority of us have sincere doubt about either of them even being bubble players. So it IS a silly question, but that might be because you didn't ask what you meant.
Anyone could get cut, for sure, but it's less likely to be those two than any number of other players.
Good point first thread I've opened. I worded it wrong. Thanks for the constructive feedback.