I'm fine with Amendola doing it. Blount did have some moments but Amendola has, too. I was shocked at how well Blount did in that role last year (around 29 yards/return). Amendola is at around 26 yards/return, I think.
Leave Amendola. Just last game he almost broke through that wave. My only problem with our kickoff returns is Slater. Slater is constantly forcing our returners to knee the ball even when it isn't that deep.
Leave Amendola. Just last game he almost broke through that wave. My only problem with our kickoff returns is Slater. Slater is constantly forcing our returners to knee the ball even when it isn't that deep.
You are most likely right, but I noticed that we seemed to return the ball more frequently when Slater isn't the upman. It seemed like Amendola ran every one that was capable of running out when Lafell was the upman.
As for the substance, I'm with Jackson 2 -- it seems to me that this season we've seen a mass of kick-off returns that were stopped before the 20. Still, if we have to put a KR at risk, who is more expendable: Danny A or Blount? (Sorry to say that, but the answer looks obvious to me.)
Blount was below average until blowing up against Buffalo. Amendola is actually more than a full yard higher than LaGarrette had last year prior to week 17.
Blount seems like a good guy for the Kick return job but he was not doing much in the job while he was with Pittsburgh. BB also doesn't like having starters do kick returners and at this point Blount is the starting Running back.