Ring 6
PatsFans.com Supporter
PatsFans.com Supporter
2021 Weekly Picks Winner
2022 Weekly Picks Winner
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 63,761
- Reaction score
- 14,113
Wait, you are mixing up facts.Well he gave them a month to watch the sex acts so I question the wisdom in that considering the conditions you laid out. The idea that victims being allowed to be recorded by a judge being trafficked and living under those conditions doesn't even make you bat an eye does it? Anyway if you're too dug in to even consider that could have been wrong then I'm done here.
He gave them a maximum of 30 days because that’s what the statute says.
He also included language about protecting the rights of thise not engaging in prostitution and so forth.
I’m not sure why including a recording device ac part of an investigation suddenly rises to horrible behavior. The judge didn’t tell them to sell it on the internet. The sunshine laws protect it from being released with any images of victims.
Speaking of dug in, it seems like you want to create a scenario where everyone on the LE side is a dishonest, incompetent person trying to manipulate the situation for personal gain and then choose the pieces that support it and ignore the pieces that don’t.
Are we really going to judge the merits of the investigation base upon you making up that they sat and filmed for 30 days when you have no idea that is correct?
*the information is coming from the warrants we have seen which do not include the kraft one