Almost every game is dominated by the 3WR shotgun formation, look at Reiss's post game formation charts.
It's a lot easier going about this the other way: prove his assertion that he changed up the offense every single week. If you can only name a few examples out of 4 years of play calling where he came up with a different looking offense, then you know he is a liar and full of crap of telling the Denver media he ran an amoeba-like offense while up here. Even his biggest defenders don't argue this point, they spend energy trying to argue why being predictable isn't necessarily a bad thing.
Nope. Sorry, dude. You still haven't managed to make an actual argument yet.
As I pointed out before, simply pointing out that the Pats -- like most teams in the NFL do at this point -- used the 3WR, 1TE, single back as their base formation doesn't in any way suggest that the Patriots offense did not change significantly from week to week. Being amoeba-like is about more than using different personnel packages.
Again, as I pointed out before, offenses predicated on entirely different philosophies are all run out of the same few personnel groupings.
As for the one in particular, 3 WR, 1TE, one RB... just think about how many different ways you can change that up, all pre-snap. Does Faulk or Morris get motioned out into the slot? Does Watson back off the line into more of a FB position? Heck, we've seen Welker motion into something of an H-Back position. Do you start with trips receivers on one side, and motion Moss across? Do you motion into a 3 WR stack? Do you have your TE and slot WR lined up tight in, off the line, with the wideouts lined up just outside?
These are just a tiny sampling of the pre-snap variations I've seen the Pats' use from just that one personnel grouping. And this is all just pre-snap stuff. We haven't even gotten to the variations in the roles the players play once the play starts.
In one game in '07, I remember the Pats starting off in their 3WR base, and running the ball five times in a row. In each situation Welker -- sometimes coming out of the backfield, sometimes motioned in like a TE, and sometimes from a standard slot position -- would hunt down the opposing defenses' MLB like a a heat-seeking missile, and throw nasty block after block. And it worked, too -- the first few times, the MLB didn't expect the team's little WR to be lead-blocking like an H-back. So finally, after getting taken out of the play one too many times, the MLB sees Welker coming, and cuts in and around him...
...only this time, it's a play-action pass, and Welker, having just had the only defended in his zone RUN AWAY from him, catches an easy ball over the middle for a HUGE run after the catch.
So, please, buddy -- if you want to make an actual argument, you're going to have to expand your understanding of the game a bit. Otherwise, you're like some PTA mom who wouldn't know Stephen Jay Gould from Homer Jay Simpson shouting out their opinion on evolution at the local school board meeting.