dryheat44
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2004
- Messages
- 6,351
- Reaction score
- 78
Comments
3. The Bears trade away the opportunity to draft Stafford for a mere 6th round pick? This is so dumb. Kyle Orton is NOT the answer. If Stafford fell that far they would HAVE to take him. Unless they were getting offered two 1st round picks in return, they should take him. A mere 6th is not enough for the top rated QB of the draft.
4. I'm not saying I like the QBs in this draft, but I just don't see them sliding that far.
5. Why a wide receiver for the Pats that early? Do you think it's that big of a need or do you just like Robiskie that much?
3. I think Orton is probably better than Stafford. He quietly had a nice season last year. I don't think they're in the market for a 1st round QB, but you bring up an excellent point. They could probably leverage more out of Tampa. However, Chicago has one offensive tackle under 34 under contract...Williams, who was hurt all last year. I think they would be very happy to take Smith there.
5. Yes, I think it's a need. Robiskie doesn't have the upside of Nicks or DHB, but he can contribute immediately. His knowledge of his position and the game are fantastic, and he's been around football all his life, which is a plus. I think out of the box he's better than Lewis or Aiken to play the third starting WR.