- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
Offensive lineman normally wouldn't get a late hit or unnecessary roughness?
That particular play (that action, those circumstance) is not usually called, even with regular officials. The retaliation is called far more often.
Either way, you're making the mistake of assuming that I'm excusing the referees. I'm not. If you've paid attention to my posts, you'd know that I've been dumping on them from jump street.
I'm not making that mistake at all. I'm pointing out that your argument is ridiculously flawed. You're essentially saying "The officials were horrible. They had game changing calls. BUT..... they weren't the reason the Patriots lost. The Patriots lost because the Ravens moved the ball and scored, and we can't consider that the reason that the Ravens were moving the ball was often specifically because of those game changing blown calls by the officials."
Sorry, but that's just nonsense.
However, it doesn't change the fact that the team that executed better down the stretch won the game. That's a fact that's simply undeniable. The Patriots could have overcome the bad calls. They've done it before. Instead, the offense stalled on their last possession and the defense couldn't overcome the phantom McCourty penalty and still let Baltimore drive down the field. As I noted in the other thread, Wilfork echoed my sentiments after the game while still noting the officials.
The Ravens didn't really execute better down the stretch, though. That's the point. The Patriots often did their job. The officials blew the calls. That allowed the Ravens multiple additional opportunities.
And this "overcome" thing is garbage. You aren't expected to "overcome" game changing mistakes late in games. That's why we call them "game changing".
Last edited: