jeffbiologist
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2007
- Messages
- 1,440
- Reaction score
- 14
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Your track record is absolutely miserable so I'm sure there are plenty of other mistakes, but off the top of my head Ellis Hobbs started the final 8 games in 2005.
Scott Gostowski
I did need a quick edit and for that I apologize. Hobbs started less than half a season so I didnt consider him....What of my track record is miserable?? I think its a topical post dont you?
I did need a quick edit and for that I apologize. Hobbs started less than half a season so I didnt consider him....What of my track record is miserable?? I think its a topical post dont you?
u cant say for a whole season...
injuries play a huge impact in that, u can say the majority of the seaosn, so at least 10 games, but the WHOLE season?
what starters did we have this past year the Started EVERY GAME, the WHOLE SEASON?
brady, moss, light, mankins, wilfork, warren, asante are the only ones that come to my mind
It was meant as a fun quiz, nothing more. I should have been more prepared and got it right the first time....but its still informative dont you agree?
The track record I speak of is that in the past hour you have called Chad Jackson fat and lazy and stated that all Michigan players are busts.
He didn't look out of shape to me. I guess it was only well known to the people to whom is it well known that BB/SP have a terrible track record in hte draft and to whom it is well known that all players from Michigan are busts and too whom it is well known that hamstring injuries are caused by being out of shape.shape(never said fat) and that is a common cause for hamstring injuries.
Look, I am not a hater, but we all like playing GMs and we all know there are things that can be done better. This isnt a ***********. This is my point:
We draft first round picks to START(essentially GIVING them jobs)-7/8(88%) first round picks started day 1....
Now we have had 63 picks from 2-7 in the last 7 years. I also know we are a great team, and there is a limited number of spots....but only 5/63(8%) of these guys were given the same opportunity. Talent, sure, has alot to do with it. But just look at the ODDS, look back at the teams.....these are MY conclusions:
We draft for NEED in round 1, and that historically has never worked out for any other team. I wonder if it isnt just our superior COACHING rather than superior DRAFTING that is making these players look alot better than they are. Why do I have a feeling that BB could swap spots with Dungy, Del Rio, Timlin or even a lesser team and BEAT US? Am I alone?