Welcome to PatsFans.com

Patten retires; Welker returns; Related?

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by TheGodInAGreyHoodie, Aug 1, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. TheGodInAGreyHoodie

    TheGodInAGreyHoodie Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Messages:
    6,631
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +26 / 0 / -0

    Patten retires freeing up a spot on the 80 man roster. Welker comes off of PUP next day.

    My speculation is that Patten was signed in the first place because the Patriots were worried about the health of Welker to start the season and Patten was given the opportunity to announce his retirement to avoid the humiliation of being cut.
  2. Palm Beach Pats Fan

    Palm Beach Pats Fan Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    Messages:
    3,443
    Likes Received:
    23
    Ratings:
    +60 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    Burgess not reporting created another spot already, so Patten didn't need to retire to create a spot for Wes.

    He retired because he wanted to retire, IMO
  3. RayClay

    RayClay On the Roster

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    18,582
    Likes Received:
    290
    Ratings:
    +751 / 6 / -11

    #75 Jersey

    No
    .....................
  4. Calciumee

    Calciumee PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2008
    Messages:
    4,610
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -1

    #3 Jersey

    Very much doubt it, but I suppose anything is possible.
  5. 5 Rings for Brady!!

    5 Rings for Brady!! Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,753
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    +1

    Although clearly Patten was brought in to create depth, BB would not have wanted less competition in camp, especially from a guy that was being a positive veteran influence on the youngsters. You need depth like Patten just to make it thru four pre season games.
  6. ctpatsfan77

    ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,843
    Likes Received:
    230
    Ratings:
    +619 / 11 / -6

    IIRC, players on PUP count against the 80-man limit. Unsigned players don't.
  7. SEPatsFan

    SEPatsFan Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Possible, but not likely. Patten was out of the league last year, and even if he looked OK in camp and in practice, who knows how his body feels. On top of that, Patten and Welker do not play the same position, or run the same routes; they really did not overlap at all, except they are both WRs.

    SSDD
  8. pats1

    pats1 Moderator PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    13,261
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    Welker already counted against the 80-man roster. Burgess going on DNR already created a spot, so they were at 79 to begin with.
  9. spacecrime

    spacecrime Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    17
    Ratings:
    +17 / 0 / -0

    I'm missing the logic.

    First, why would it be humiliating for Patten to be cut?

    Second, if Patten was going to be a Welker replacement for he six weeks Welker would be on PUP, Patten was still looking at being cut mid-season.

    But I cannot imagine Patten being signed to cover Welker's spot. Totally different receiver skill sets.
  10. TheGodInAGreyHoodie

    TheGodInAGreyHoodie Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Messages:
    6,631
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +26 / 0 / -0

    Are you serious?

    Might have been the plan. Maybe one even share with Patten. BB, "Hey David, with Wes's injury we are bit light at WR, anyway I could enitice you to play this year." "Coach, I am gett'in a bit old, I am not sure I could handle an entire season" "I don't need ya for the whole season, just til Wes comes back. And with your vet status you will get paid for the whole season even if he is ready for week 2" "ok"

    True, just depth at WR. And I am not saying they would have necessarily cut him at the 80 mark. It might have been one of those deals where with Wes being back, there would not be room for both of them on the 53 man roster and BB told him he has very long odds to make the team and he might not want to go thru the pain of TC, now that there won't be enough WR spots on the final 53.

    Or maybe nothing was said, but with Welker's return Patten "saw the writing on the wall" that there were too many WRs on the team for him to realistically make the team.
  11. Destroyer

    Destroyer Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2010
    Messages:
    99
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Really? The "humiliation of being cut?"
  12. Reckedtrek

    Reckedtrek Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,741
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    #95 Jersey

    I don't think the two (Patten's retirement and Welker's return) are related for reasons already listed. It's a coincidence that they both play WR.
  13. RayClay

    RayClay On the Roster

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    18,582
    Likes Received:
    290
    Ratings:
    +751 / 6 / -11

    #75 Jersey

    If Tate and Price look good that probably was more influential IMO.
  14. Fencer

    Fencer Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2006
    Messages:
    7,865
    Likes Received:
    45
    Ratings:
    +129 / 2 / -15

    #12 Jersey

    If we take Patten at face value, he quit because he didn't have the heart to keep working and competing at the level he felt the game requires.

    In that case, Welker could have been an example to him.

    Beyond that, feeling one couldn't win the competition would surely sap one's drive a bit.

    I don't think there's any need to slice the salami too finely. All the obvious theories could be true at once.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>