Welcome to PatsFans.com

Pats receive 3 comp picks

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by slash83, Mar 23, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. slash83

    slash83 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    3,201
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

  2. pats_premi

    pats_premi Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    277
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

  3. DefenseRules

    DefenseRules Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2005
    Messages:
    9,790
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +48 / 0 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    EXCELLENT :D We have the amunition to have a good draft.
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2009
  4. slash83

    slash83 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    3,201
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    You mean a great draft...
  5. JoeSixPat

    JoeSixPat Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    9,852
    Likes Received:
    27
    Ratings:
    +46 / 2 / -0

    So what do they have now, 5 of the top 100 picks?

    I have to think that Belichick is going to trade at least 2 of them... and he can't trade #97
  6. slash83

    slash83 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    3,201
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    Nope cant trade comp picks, Id be very surprised if at least one of the picks in the first 3 rounds arent traded somehow. Hopefully one of this is for Pep ;)
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2009
  7. DefenseRules

    DefenseRules Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2005
    Messages:
    9,790
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +48 / 0 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    I stand corrected. :)
  8. SoCal Bong

    SoCal Bong Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,321
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    I just realized that the NFL Team meetings are happening not far from where I live in Dana Point. Anyone know what Patriots representatives are there? I'm thinking of stopping by for "lunch" at the hotel.
  9. Feep50

    Feep50 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2007
    Messages:
    731
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0


    New England now has six selections in the top 100. They have their own first-round pick (No. 23 overall). Three third-round selections -- No. 34 (acquired from the Chiefs for Matt Cassel and Mike Vrabel), No. 47 (acquired in a trade with the Chargers during the 2008 draft) and their own pick at No. 58. Then they have a pair of third-rounders -- their own pick (No. 89) and the compensatory pick.

    #23-#34-#47-#58-#89-#97 :cool:
  10. farn

    farn Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2009
    Messages:
    1,714
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    I think the big one (obv) is the #3. It is the first one after the regular #3s and should in a spot to land someone decent.

    As pointed out, I also believe BB will be moving some picks (can't move these new ones, but...). He always does - he has many in this draft - he has quite a few quality players and therefore limited spots.

    I'd personally like to see them move one the the 2s for a 1st next year (maybe someone who thinks they're a playoff team would figure it's not that much diff).

    Bottom line : as much as I enjoy the potential to add to the squad, I need to believe more will be used on D than O. I'm not choosy - it can be anywhere on D. Even the DL that some will say is of quality. They will be moving Seymour (or letting him move himself) eventually, I have to believe.
  11. KDPPatsfan85

    KDPPatsfan85 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Messages:
    2,364
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +49 / 1 / -6

    #51 Jersey

    I agree! With all the picks we have and limited roster space!! We might have 2 first rounders this draft!!
  12. TealSox

    TealSox Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Pays to lose players, while it could be argued that Samuel would had greatly improved the 08 version of the New England Patriots.

    First round = 1

    Second round = 3

    Third round = 2*

    Fourth round = 1

    Fifth round = 1*

    Sixth round = 2*

    Seventh round = 1

    Since the roster is stacked with players that won't likely be traded or released, I find it hard to deal with so many picks this year. So the obvious solution is to trade off a ton of picks. Here is hoping that a the Pats come out of this draft with 1.) a grip of legitimate talent and/or 2.) a ton of ammo, aka picks, for the 2010 draft. 2 first rounders in 2010 would be amazing.
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 23, 2009
  13. KDPPatsfan85

    KDPPatsfan85 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Messages:
    2,364
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +49 / 1 / -6

    #51 Jersey

    Yea imagine trading up to the first round so we will have 2 dominant players in the first round this year then trade our later picks for possible first rounders next year!
  14. farn

    farn Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2009
    Messages:
    1,714
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    BB has shown he is not scred of moving up a few spots. I think he did so to grap T. Warren. He also moved up to get the infamous WR C.Jackson.

    I'd be quite surprised if they moved up to get another #1 unless it's packaging the #34 they got for Cassel. But something tells me (even though I can't produce the proof) that the #31, for example, which is 2nd to last in round 1 is much more expensive than #34, the second pick in round 2. And unless there is a beast there for the taking, I'd be kinda surprised to see BB make that jump on account of the dollar signs.

    We'll see in April. Let's sit back on that weekend and enjoy the ride. If they make a crazy Moss-like trade, that would really jumpstart 09 - though I can't see a deal being that lopsided going down again. Even Peppers for a 3rd wouldn't be the steal Moss was... he even came cheap.

    Can we fastforward real life ?
  15. bigfandan

    bigfandan Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2009
    Messages:
    523
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    I would say OL can use some upgrades. This line as is will have trouble against strong D lines the likes of Giants, Steelers, and Cowboys.
  16. farn

    farn Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2009
    Messages:
    1,714
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0


    I wouldn't hate that. To be honest, if the Pats had a top 10 pick, I'd probably predict they'd go that route because I think BB likes the value at that spot in the draft for OL. BUT... Scar is a beastmaster. I'm quite a bit more worried about stopping their scoring than our own scoring (yes, I am using I and WE even though I'd clearly have a hard time surviving even the easiest non-contact drill in July).
  17. Jimke

    Jimke Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    3,701
    Likes Received:
    11
    Ratings:
    +15 / 0 / -0

    One minor correction. The Patriots have only the compensatory pick in

    the 5th round. Their 5th round pick was traded for Greg Lewis and a 7th

    round pick in 2010.
  18. juxtapoz15

    juxtapoz15 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2007
    Messages:
    364
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0 / -0

    #54 Jersey

    Here is the complete list from PFT.com. I'm surprised Pittsburgh didn't get a 3rd for losing Faneca.


    The 2009 compensatory picks are set forth below, with round, overall place in round, overall place in draft, and team.

    3 (33-97) New England

    3 (34-98) Cincinnati

    3 (35-99) Chicago

    3 (36-100) NY Giants

    4 (33-133) San Diego

    4 (34-134) San Diego

    4 (35-135) Tennessee

    4 (36-136) Indianapolis

    5 (33-169) Pittsburgh

    5 (34-170) New England

    5 (35-171) San Francisco

    5 (36-172) Dallas

    5 (37-173) Tennessee

    6 (33-206) Tennessee

    6 (34-207) New England

    6 (35-2080 Dallas

    6 (36-209) Cincinnati

    7 (33-242) Tennessee

    7 (34-243) Washington

    7 (35-244) San Francisco

    7 (36-245) Seattle

    7 (37-246) Chicago

    7 (38-247) Seattle

    7 (39-248) Seattle

    7 (40-249) Cincinnati

    7 (41-250) Jacksonville

    7 (42-251) Chicago

    7 (43-252) Cincinnati

    7 (44-253) Jacksonville

    7 (45-254) Arizona

    7 (46-255) Detroit

    7 (47-256) Kansas City
  19. mayoclinic

    mayoclinic PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    12,617
    Likes Received:
    151
    Ratings:
    +341 / 0 / -1

    Pretty much what I expected. I thought our 3rd round comp for Asante would end up being 97, and a 5th and 6th is about right, much as I had been hoping for a 4th.

    Right now I see our mostly likely trade picks being #58 and 89. I can see using #89 to trade into 2010, or potentially to package with one of our day 1 picks in order to move up. #89 + 23 gets us to around #18; #89 + 34 gets us to around #26; #89 + 47 gets us to around #34-35; and #89 + 58 gets us to around #43. I would like to see us get at least 3 really top prospects out of the first day, and trading up may help to get them. With the #97 pick, we should still be able to get a quality prospect early on the second day. I could also see us trading #58 into 2010 if there is better value there.

    Can't wait to see what we do on draft day.
  20. The_Riddler

    The_Riddler Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,518
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I'm sure this just ruined John Clayton's night
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>