sevengables_2207
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2010
- Messages
- 2,321
- Reaction score
- 1,272
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Maybe but wasn't then how does anyone on the other side explain the "give somebody else that jacket" part of the text?Eh, I've been on the Pats' side through all of this but the weight loss explanation sounds EXTREMELY made up. I would call ******** on that if I were on the other side of this.
Eh, I've been on the Pats' side through all of this but the weight loss explanation sounds EXTREMELY made up. I would call ******** on that if I were on the other side of this.
They had to address those texts, if they were going to respond to the report. It should come as no surprise that trying to fully explain the texts of guys using "Doritos Dink" will take more than a few words on a page.
I sincerely hope they are taking the mickey with that deflator quote because but if not that's just made the whole organisation a complete laughing stock
Me to, so i'd like to know how it came up. For example since they're working with the footballs and on of them is trying to lose wgt its not in-concievable at all for the two of them bantering back and forth and and the term deflator comes up, but thats all wells has and that is not enough when taken in context with all the rest to come to the conclusion that there was a plot to deflate the footballs.Eh, I've been on the Pats' side through all of this but the weight loss explanation sounds EXTREMELY made up. I would call ******** on that if I were on the other side of this.
It undermines the meat of their rebuttal because of how silly that particular explanation sounds, even if it's true.
I bet McNally's new nickname will forever be Dorito Dink.
And Thats That.
The Patriots response should have been
"We're on to the appeal".
Instead, they've now needlessly locked themselves into a narrative.