GroganCountry
Practice Squad Player
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2008
- Messages
- 188
- Reaction score
- 0
I think when BB passes on that you won't read 2 paragraphs without reading about spygate. When John Calipari passes you'll read in every single article about his 2 vacated Final 4s. Eddie Sutton and cash in overnight envelopes, Bob Knight and his off the court stuff that cost him his job at Indiana, etc.
Wooden was a great coach and by all accounts a pretty good guy who was nice to people and whose players loved him. He also cheated to achieve what he did. He ran a dirty program in what everyone knows is a dirty business. I don't think that this is necessarily the time for the media to bring it up but they wouldn't give most others the same courtesy and the over the top sainthood stuff is just a bit much for my taste.
Great point. In all the coverage I've seen, Sam Gilbert has not come up once because Wooden was such a beloved guy by the press and many others (and deservedly so in most cases). Compare that to someone like Belichick, who when he passes, will be eulogized deferentially...but make no mistake, Spygate will be brought up constantly, rightly or wrongly. It is incredibly hypocritical is all I'm saying.
I don't think the posters who have challenged you, based on their records here, are the kind of people who would purge the truth from an evaluation of anyone's life. I just think they're suggesting that the days immediately after someone's death might not be the time to focus on the negatives.
I wasn't trying to desecrate Wooden's legacy or offend anybody - it was just an honest post on a Patriot messageboard after all. And I understand your point about timing but I respectfully disagree - if anyone takes offense to a negative fact about the man's tenure at UCLA because it's so quick after his death, that's silly. I simply interjected a little honesty in the thread. Regardless, he was a great coach and a great teacher whose records stand alone.