- Joined
- Mar 4, 2007
- Messages
- 11,972
- Reaction score
- 11,571
I was ecstatic when a few Columbia professors and others blew the doors off that Exponent ********.
SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
I just expect judges to show sound ...you know... judgement. Plus, the case had already been decided, he just had to say it stands.
Rosie O'donnell
... and it's because the NYJFL is run by ex-Jete employees like Goodell and his butt boy Mike Kensil.
I'd settle for one of them making one tackle on the last play in MIA this season.
Yep, the judge was merely applying the law, basically. Article 46 gives the Omissioner the authority to do what he did, so whatever punishments he administers will have the backing of the legal system, which it kinda should. The lower court gave us a moral victory, perhaps knowing that the decision would be over-turned later anyway. It's article 46 that needs to be changed, but that's not happening unless and until it becomes a point of emphasis during the next CBA negotiations.
I don't care about any other fans, or anyone else for that matter, when it comes to the Pats. They think they are cheaters? Fine. They are gonna think what they are gonna think, and unless they want to research the Charles Gas Law, the Boyle's Gas Law, the Ideal Gas Law, the NFL regulations on camera placement or any other ******** that they want to throw at me, they don't know what the f*ck they are talking about anyway. So, eff 'em, and I can't hear them over the sound of my eff'n Lobardi trophies! Look at my signature!! Eff Everybody, scorched earth on the lot of them, because they would all change places with us in a second.
You make a good point (as usual). My problem wasn't with him making a mistake (everyone does that), it is publishing such an egregious mistake. The whole point of doing scientific research is to spend a gigantic amount of time (including having it formally peer reviewed) making sure that scientific research you publish is right. IMHO, either act like a scientist or stop claiming you are one.
...However, I'm not even on twitter (let alone having all of Tyson's followers), so perhaps I'm just showing how behind the times I am with all of my "raving" or howling at the moon about this issue, I'm just trying to follow the example of my other old fart colleagues on this board to: "Do not go gentle into that good night, Old age should burn and rave at close of day".
