PonyExpress
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2006
- Messages
- 4,659
- Reaction score
- 78
How about this PFT entry from November 2006:
Easterbrook was maybe the first "reporter" to urge the NFL to make "Sunday Ticket" avaliable on Cable, one of Comcast's talking points. He seems very in tune with Spector's comments. Interesting that Easterbrook was so dialed in on this arcane league issue at such an early date. These same characters converged again around another issue, a year later: LIEgate.
Easterbrook was the driving force behind ESPN's coverage of "LIEgate". He was the one who constantly hinted at Walsh's existence. He was the one who ranted about the "walkthrough tape" the day before the SB. Almost in tandem, Spector then had his face on every TV screen mimicking Easterbrook's fake outrage. The NFL commissioner laughed during the Q & A portion of his pre SB "state of the NFL" speech, after a planted comment from the peanut gallery about Spector's link to Comcast's campaign cash.
Connecting the dots...
It certainly seems possible that Easterbrook was acting as the public mouthpiece for Comcast and Spector. The motive may have been to use the threat of public scandal as a way to pressure Mr. Kraft, head of the NFL television committee, into agreeing to sell a stake in NFLNetwork or forking over the Sunday Ticket rights to Comcast.
Not a big deal. Just high stakes blackmail, with billions of dollars at stake. Good vs Evil, right Mr. Easterbrook?
http://archive.profootballtalk.com/11-1-06through11-15-06.htmPOSTED 12:01 a.m. EST; UPDATED 12:21 a.m. EST, November 15, 2006
CONGRESS "INTRIGUED" BY NFLN
The Associated Press reports that Congress is taking a look at the plans of the NFL's in-house television network to air regular-season games.
"We're intrigued, to put it mildly," Senator Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) said during hearings held on Tuesday.
The Senate Judiciary Committee is analyzing whether the NFL's plan to air its own games on its own network raises antitrust issues. In our view, the hearings suggest that perhaps Time Warner -- the league's primary adversary in a high-stakes game of cable chicken which soon will boil over when the best game on Thanksgiving isn't available in many markets -- has enough juice in D.C. to make trouble for the NFL.
The hearings first were mentioned earlier in the day by Gregg Easterbook in his TMQ column on ESPN.com's Page 2.
Testifying at the hearing were NFL executive V.P. and general counsel Jeffrey Pash, DirecTV executive V.P. Daniel Fawcett, and Time Warner C.O.O. Landel Hobbs. Easterbrook suggests (and we agree) that the NFL should move quickly to make the Sunday Ticket package available via cable. We also think that the league should bury the hatchet with Time Warner pronto, working out a deal that makes NFLN available to millions of consumers who don't presently get it.
Easterbrook was maybe the first "reporter" to urge the NFL to make "Sunday Ticket" avaliable on Cable, one of Comcast's talking points. He seems very in tune with Spector's comments. Interesting that Easterbrook was so dialed in on this arcane league issue at such an early date. These same characters converged again around another issue, a year later: LIEgate.
Easterbrook was the driving force behind ESPN's coverage of "LIEgate". He was the one who constantly hinted at Walsh's existence. He was the one who ranted about the "walkthrough tape" the day before the SB. Almost in tandem, Spector then had his face on every TV screen mimicking Easterbrook's fake outrage. The NFL commissioner laughed during the Q & A portion of his pre SB "state of the NFL" speech, after a planted comment from the peanut gallery about Spector's link to Comcast's campaign cash.
Connecting the dots...
It certainly seems possible that Easterbrook was acting as the public mouthpiece for Comcast and Spector. The motive may have been to use the threat of public scandal as a way to pressure Mr. Kraft, head of the NFL television committee, into agreeing to sell a stake in NFLNetwork or forking over the Sunday Ticket rights to Comcast.
Not a big deal. Just high stakes blackmail, with billions of dollars at stake. Good vs Evil, right Mr. Easterbrook?
Last edited: