Jeffri Chadiha: Pats far from perfect without Brady

[Rob0729]

Talk about being the master of the obvious. He actually think the Pats wouldn't have gone 16-0 last year without Brady at the helm.

I'm sorry. The article isn't all that bad and he just lists the top 10 most indespensible players with Brady at #1, but I just hate the guy and love to take shots at him especially with some of the way he positions how the Pats wouldn't have won without Brady.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=chadiha_jeffri&id=3498223

 

[Kontradiction]

What is with the Captain Obvious schtick that Chadiha has been on lately?

 

[Deus Irae]

I don't see the problem. He wrote a column about the most indispensable players in the league and put Brady and Manning at #1 and #2 respectively. It's a sequel to the same type of column last season and when he made Brady #1 his first line was:

This one shouldn't be a shocker

I'm not sure what people expect out of writers today, other than that the writers be their own personal echo chambers....

 

[spacecrime]

Talk about being the master of the obvious.

Heh heh. That's the exact thing I thought of when I read the thread topic.

Without Manning, Colts might not be as good as they have been with him.

Without 46 defense Bears might not have been so dominant in '85.

 

[Rob0729]

I don't see the problem. He wrote a column about the most indispensable players in the league and put Brady and Manning at #1 and #2 respectively. It's a sequel to the same type of column last season and when he made Brady #1 his first line was:



I'm not sure what people expect out of writers today, other than that the writers be their own personal echo chambers....

I already said the article wasn't bad, but I just like to take shots at the guy because he is such a god-awful writer.

 

[sieglo]

You know Tomlinson is throwing a hissy fit that Gates is on the list but he isn't.