karguy85
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2008
- Messages
- 1,914
- Reaction score
- 1,693
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.If Harry wasn't stealing snaps early in the year he would've had a shot at 1000. This isn't always the meritocracy it is made out to be.If he wasn't riding the bench in the early games, he would have hit 1000 without a competent passer.
While I agree Meyers should have been playing over Harry from the start, one could make a meritocratic argument for having started Harry. He showed a lot of potential in college, which counts as merit. It's not like he started because he was personal friends or business partners with the coach.If Harry wasn't stealing snaps early in the year he would've had a shot at 1000. This isn't always the meritocracy it is made out to be.
Harry started because of where he was drafted. He didn't show anything last year and there wasn't a lot of glowing reviews in training camp this year. I highly doubt he was outperforming Meyers in practice either since he cant really play. Harry had to prove again he can't play while Meyers had to prove he could.While I agree Meyers should have been playing over Harry from the start, one could make a meritocratic argument for having started Harry. He showed a lot of potential in college, which counts as merit. It's not like he started because he was personal friends or business partners with the coach.
It's just that Meyers' merit was misjudged at first.
If other concerning spots on the roster were addressed, you could win plenty of games with Meyers as your #2. It'd be ideal if he was #3 though, obv...I think he's a WR3 with WR2 potential. Was really impressed with his route running this year.
I thought that was an interesting statistic, especially given that he had a pretty good year (compared to the rest of the offense). Do you think he can be a 1k a year receiver with a competent passer?