i didnt read the article and dont intend to either but calling out BB's dressing sense is totally going out of the way to find faults.My letter to McGrory and the Globe:
Brian,
Your column today was a reach, and unfair. I was at Sunday's game and watched the incident you decry from beginning to end through binoculars. Perhaps it hasn't occurred to you that Jim Davis might be suspect of committing the cardinal sin of any journalist: carelessly putting himself in position to become part of the story he's there to cover. (Unfortunately, I've observed Globe reporters do similar things time and again over the years so perhaps you folks feel you're "above it all" just as you accuse Belichick of being.)
Davis was walking backward in the path of Belichick, literally altering the course of the event he was there to cover. Granted, Belichick let his frustration get the better of him and behaved inappropriately in shoving Davis. But under these circumstances -- an intensely personal moment for the coach after a very intense, hard-fought playoff game with much on the line -- his reaction is understandable, if not totally justified.
By calling Belichick "a boor of the highest order," "one cheap - shot artist standing in judgment of another," claiming "he dresses like he's from Appalachia and has the personality of a wet mop" is piling on with undue zeal and totally out of context.
Jim Davis was not beyond reproach in this incident and neither was Belichick, yet the coach did apologize and the apology was accepted. Did Davis apologize for getting in his way?
You are in a position to lend reasoned and balanced perspective to stories like this but succumbed to doing a hatchet job on the coach. You, Brian McGrory, dropped the ball.
SITE MENU