Passer Rating is the most flawed tool in all of sports
Actually its a pretty good tool for measuring an individuals skill at passing. Your analysis, however, is horrifically flawed.
I even read an article a while ago about how coaches don't put any stock in it, there were quotes specifically from Holmgren and others
Coaches don't use any of the standard statistics to make decisions. Football is their profession, and they can afford to invest lifetimes creating their own, more accurate statistics. Case in point, the Patriots perform their own calculation of tackles, often coming up with wildly different numbers from NFL.com. The Patriots' number is influenced by BB's 30 years in the league. The NFL's numbers are not.
Case and point... Chad Pennington basically has a 90 career QB rating. But his team never scores any points.
Obviously neither of these are true. He has an 89.3 career rating and has thrown for 81 Touchdowns. Now that I've established that you are being hyperbolic we can continue.
Theyve never been in the top 15 in scoring since he has been the starting QB, and hes played the majority of that time with a Hall of Fame back to boot.
Curtis Martin will never be in the HOF. Not even close
Its too reliant on completion %. In the NFL the passing game is often about big plays
Chad's career completion percentage is 65.3%. Right now the median of all "qualified" NFL QBs is 63.35%. Chad gets roughly 1.63 extra points for having an above average completion percentage. I hardly think that this is "too reliant" on completion percentage (in fact, it looks like completion percentage has relatively little impact on QBs who are anywhere near the middle of the pack).
A guy like Chad Pennington dinks and dunks his way to completing 2/3 of his passes every year, but doesnt make big plays and his offense never scores points, even when they were blessed with a HOF RB. Its about scoring points. Thats the job of the offense, not dinking and dunking your way to a bottom half of the league scoring total but having a pretty completion %
Right now Chad has a career average of 7.2 yards per pass attempt. The current NFL median amongst "qualified" passers is 7.0. Most NFL QBs dink and dunk MORE than Chad. This includes Donnovan McNabb whose career average is 6.8. (Both QBs have a 7.1 average this year).
Compared to the average QB in the league right now, Chad is LESS of a dink and dunk passer
Chad is also doing well in the scoring department with 9 TDs. This is tied with Brett Favre at 9th. Of the 10 QBs with 9 or more TDs only one (Big Ben) has fewer attempts than Chad.
If the Jets didn't have the 25th worst running game in the league, the 28th worst defense in the league, and a rat's a@@ for a coach, they might actually be able to win some games.
A passer who goes 2 for 3 with 3 yards passing garners a 70 QB rating
A passer who goes 1 for 3 with 20 yards passing garners a 57
Someone please tell me on what planet that makes any sense?
A QB with a 33% completion percentage can not play in the NFL. A QB with 1.0 Yards per attempt can not play in the NFL. Comparing these two high school QBs by using a rating designed for the NFL is what doesn't make any sense.
Chad Pennington has a higher career QB rating then Donovan McNabb. Any metric that would lead you to believe Pennington is a better QB then McNabb over his career is absolutely useless
The metric doesn't say that Chad is a better QB. It says he is a better PASSER. Without any doubt, Chad is a better passer than Donovan. He completes twelve percent more of his passes [65.3 vs 58.3] for .4 yards more per attempt. Find me a coach he says differently.
Donovan McNabb is better at scrambling. McNabb is better at rushing. McNabb is clearly inferior at passing, and that is what PASSER rating measures.