Brady'sButtBoy
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2005
- Messages
- 1,900
- Reaction score
- 137
Just to confirm an elementary aspect of NFL finance -
When a player is cut a certain amout counts against the total cap number but does the team have to actually PAY that money to a player? If they don't - then taking a 'cap hit' may squeeze the roster but it would/could save the organization millions of dollars.
For instance, Dillon's money was supposedly 'guaranteed' for 2006 and thus he would be paid $4.5 million even if he were cut. But this seems to a rarity. Take Willie's $8mil cap number, if he were cut a portion of that would count against the total cap number for 2006 but McGinest wouldn't receive a dime, right?
So... cutting a player in McGinest's position would hurt the cap but actually save the Pat's millions on the bottom line? (I'm not advocating cutting McGinest, only using him for an example)
Thanks....
When a player is cut a certain amout counts against the total cap number but does the team have to actually PAY that money to a player? If they don't - then taking a 'cap hit' may squeeze the roster but it would/could save the organization millions of dollars.
For instance, Dillon's money was supposedly 'guaranteed' for 2006 and thus he would be paid $4.5 million even if he were cut. But this seems to a rarity. Take Willie's $8mil cap number, if he were cut a portion of that would count against the total cap number for 2006 but McGinest wouldn't receive a dime, right?
So... cutting a player in McGinest's position would hurt the cap but actually save the Pat's millions on the bottom line? (I'm not advocating cutting McGinest, only using him for an example)
Thanks....