- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Messages
- 2,641
- Reaction score
- 506
(King Brady seated in throne pic)
Hmmm, that's a bit more decadent than Brady deserves.... Tom is a bit more front-line than that:
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.(King Brady seated in throne pic)
Bill Russell or Wilt Chamberlain? Tom Brady or Peyton Manning? Stuff or puff? The answers have never been in doubt.
It's the exact reason why i HATE him. I know it's a strong word but i really mean it because he is always 'me, me, me give me my TD's'Typical fantasy stats for Manning. Four hundred and something useless yards. That's what makes him so good right?
And this is the difference between the two men and why Brady is better: He's malleable. He adjusts. He can play in any weather, with any offensive group, and beat you.
For Manning, the conditions have to be perfect for him to prosper. He's a front-runner, which is why he has so much statistical greatness and not Super Bowl moments. The Super Bowl is the ultimate setting where insanity is the norm, and Brady has played well in all of his Super Bowls because he prospers under adversity. Manning doesn't.
I don't even know what the Manning people's argument IS anymore, or how it could possibly make any sense
Latest version:
- The 3 SBs don't count because of Spygate
- Brady has been losing big games just like Manning in the last 10 years
- Manning had the only SB win in the last 10 years and without spygate
- Belichick and the defense have been the difference, not Brady
It's weak sauce, but it's all they've got left.
Holy ****e. This article is dazzling.
I don't even know what the Manning people's argument IS anymore, or how it could possibly make any sense