JMC00
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2012
- Messages
- 16,756
- Reaction score
- 25,428
the CA2 has not stayed the panel ruling so I think he still is.
automatic stay once this was filed
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.the CA2 has not stayed the panel ruling so I think he still is.
So um, if Olsen chose to use italics he must know what he's doing right?
FWIW, a friend of mine is a law professor (and he's also clerked for CA7's Frank Easterbrook) and he told me he was pretty surprised by all the italicized words (other than cites) as that's not Olson's style: "to me that is a strong sign that Olson is not playing a controlling role in this appeal". He also said he was surprised that the petition doesn't frame the issue as anything wider than error correction.
So um, if Olsen chose to use italics he must know what he's doing right?
yes, but appealing the en banc ruling to SCOTUS would likely mean brady plays 16 games.
SCOTUS does not hear any cases until October 1. Results begin coming months later, and usually they hold really juicy ones until April of the following year.
Overuse of italics in legal writing is distracting and sort of like USING ALL CAPS ON THE INTERNET TOO MUCH!!I would go further and state that the prolific italicization in this brief struck me as highly unusual and not in the style of any front-rank attorney. Very odd.
Yeah, don't listen to John Madden.
Lester Munson?
Now that an appeal was officially filed how long does it take to hear whether or not the case will be heard again?
... The fact that Olson, who as Solicitor General sold GWB to SCOTUS as the legitimate claimant to the Presidency, ....
Keep politics out of it.
That's history, not politics.
I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and say he is a good agent, but he was out of his league during this whole saga.
This would have been over a while ago if Yee didn't advise Brady to get rid of his phone. That has been the strawman argument used since they got a hold of that
I am curious if adding reputable names to your team also adds credibility in the court's eyes which somehow increases the odds of having an en banc hearing. (I hope that made sense)
Crazy lady Michell McGuirk is not giving up her craziness:
Screams of a nobody attorney trying to make a name for herself by riding Brady's publicity and fame
They should round all these cretins up and throw them in a deep, dark, damp dungeon like Daenerys' dragons and throw away the key