- Joined
- Sep 10, 2006
- Messages
- 16,238
- Reaction score
- 33,794
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.So it's not a little creepy that the entire Dallas Cowboys franchise from top to bottom, appears to be infatuated with Gisele?
It's creepy as ****.
Now we just need a thread with Tony Romo reacting to Jerry Jones statements reacting to Greg Hardy's statement.
And then a thread with Dez Bryant reacting to Tony Romo's statements reacting to.....
He was asked a question, what do you want him to say? "No comment"? Jerry's a bit senile now anyways so its kinda understandable and pretty tame going by his previous history.
No, it's not creepy that adult males find a 'supermodel' attractive, and make harmless comments about it.
And one player, followed by the owner answering a direct question, is not "the entire Dallas Cowboys franchise from top to bottom".
Might as well. Their season is almost over, and might be after this weekend.
Well the owner is the top and the player is the bottom so yea.
First, it's two people, so it's not the "entire Dallas Cowboys franchise", or any reasonable facsimile.
Second, if you think players are the 'bottom' of a football organization, you've lost your mind.
Jerruhs a COD, a Creppy Old Dude.http://www.si.com/nfl/2015/10/07/dallas-cowboys-jerry-jones-greg-hardy-tom-brady
Wow, someone puuuhleeeeze tell the Pats to foot stomp Jerry's team into submission, Enough is enough already
I remember multiple threads, right here on Patsfans.com, about Romo and Jessica Simpson.
Once again, adults are acting like little girls about innocuous statements.
Semantics.
The HC also made a comment about Hardy's comment, except he tried to come up with an excuse for him. Jerry, he decides to double down. It just shows that money can't buy class.
You guys are getting worked up over nothing. He's complimenting Brady, although to come clean I wouldn't have used those exact words.
It's not semantics. It's childish idiocy on the part of the usually excellent poster who made that initial post.
The whole thing is nothing more than a bunch of clowns looking for anything remotely controversial, even if they have to make it up, as they have in this case, and then being ass hats about innocuous statements.