- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 4,702
- Reaction score
- 6,840
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Feely cannot testify. No new evidence allowed in appeals. Optics, however....
Feeling testifying is not evidence in relation to Brady. He is just speaking to precedent the NFL set in a previous violation. Kessler did speak to it in his briefing.Feely cannot testify. No new evidence allowed in appeals. Optics, however....
I believe that the judge can ask him questions if Feely agrees, but he can't be compelled to speak.Feely cannot testify. No new evidence allowed in appeals. Optics, however....
Feely cannot testify. No new evidence allowed in appeals. Optics, however....
Anybody (Feely or Mara) could be asked questions in the private conference, though.
@ChoWZa I know the joke was pretty bad, but did it really deserve a dislike? Maybe Ian should implement a "not funny" rating.If Berman rules in Brady's favor, Pats haters will get touchy about Feely.
I think that is exactly it. I joked about Feely being Kessler's "Airman Rodriguez and Airman O'Malley" but the more I think about it, the more I think there's a bit of truth in that comparison.
Maybe Kessler can say something like "I personally spoke to the Jets kicker and he said such and such". It would still be hearsay but having Feely there would give weight to the statement.Feely cannot testify. No new evidence allowed in appeals. Optics, however....
Could that mean that Kessler was setting this up all along?well.....the evidence involving Feely is already in the NFLPA report