SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Ask Wallach that ?Daniel Wallach @WALLACHLEGAL 14s14 seconds ago
NFL disparages Peterson case as an "out-of-circuit district court opinion . . . currently under appeal" (Me: but it's predicated on Rice)
Weird that the NFL would disparage a case that they are currently in contempt of court over.
Ask Wallach that ?
Daniel Wallach@WALLACHLEGAL
NFL: "The CBA provides that these questions were for the Commissioner to answer. Under the law, his judgment cannot be disturbed"
Daniel Wallach@WALLACHLEGAL
NFL: "The CBA provides that these questions were for the Commissioner to answer. Under the law, his judgment cannot be disturbed"
I had to read that three times because it honestly struck me as satire the first few times. I still feel like I should confirm this is a legitimate twitter handle and not the Onion or something. Really?
if brady loses im done watching the nfl.
the whole thing is a sham. i love how tom isn't backing down to ****sucker goodell.
While I agree in theory, I still say to you that you should never claim victory until you have it, because you just never know when a judge is going to pull one out of his ass. See the passing, and upholding, of Obamacare if you have any doubts about that.
Daniel Wallach@WALLACHLEGAL
NFL: "The CBA provides that these questions were for the Commissioner to answer. Under the law, his judgment cannot be disturbed"
LINK???
Daniel Wallach @WALLACHLEGAL 13m13 minutes ago
NFL: "Supreme Court precedent precludes a retrial of Brady’s disciplinary appeal in this Court. But that is precisely what the Union seeks"
What is this crap? Nash said the same thing that day. Any one explain what he means ? That the judge cannot ovverule NFL ? then why even file this before the NFLPA in court and why hasnt the judge thrown this case out yet ? Maybe I dont follow.
Or that Goodell's findings "cannot be disturbed", even if he's the ONE THAT DISTURBED THEM.I know, it's absurd. The NFL is literally saying that judge Berman has no right to question the conclusions that they specifically asked him to validate. It is dumbfounding.