- Joined
- Nov 14, 2006
- Messages
- 49,631
- Reaction score
- 28,352
Apparently in their 15 page argument, the NFL is getting ready to fight the Judge for turning over the notes, transcripts, etc. from the Wells investigation and any communications between Wells and Pash about the writing of the report by claiming the Wells investigation wasn't independent and nor does it require to be in Article 46.
I think this is a huge PR mistake because they sold this as an independent investigation. According to Michael McCann it could be the reason they lose the case too.
https://twitter.com/adbrandt/status/629817472363982848
https://twitter.com/McCannSportsLaw/status/629820584323588096
https://twitter.com/McCannSportsLaw/status/629821378129195008
I think this is a huge PR mistake because they sold this as an independent investigation. According to Michael McCann it could be the reason they lose the case too.
Re Wells' bias, NFL: Article 46 does not require an “independent” investigation, commonplace for NFL personnel other to investigate conduct"
https://twitter.com/adbrandt/status/629817472363982848
If NFL loses to Tom Brady, chances are it won't have to do with PSI or even Brady but rather making mockery of "independent" investigations.
https://twitter.com/McCannSportsLaw/status/629820584323588096
Billy Fletcher@BillyFletch
@McCannSportsLaw what about NFL claim that investigation doesn't need to be independent under article 46?
https://twitter.com/BillyFletchMichael McCann@McCannSportsLaw
Michael McCann retweeted Billy Fletcher
NFL may be right investigation didn't need to be indpenedent, but problem for NFL is they assured everyone it was.
https://twitter.com/BillyFletch
https://twitter.com/McCannSportsLaw/status/629821378129195008