Fencer
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2006
- Messages
- 14,293
- Reaction score
- 3,986
One school of thought at this point can be summarized as:
But people who think Brady is a LITTLE BIT dirtier than that aren't necessarily being idiots. So I think it's OK to take note of people who have views approximately along these lines.
For starters, Steve Buckley is now in that camp, and whatever negative things I thought about his previous views, his current ones don't make me want to vomit, although I don't like that he still assumes the footballs were illicitly deflated.
http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/...ey_obsessed_nfl_bigger_culprit_than_tom_brady
Edit: Similarly Chris Gasper -- https://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/...ot-possible/ZXpVFrWioaya9jOCw4pT0N/story.html -- who thinks Goodell is totally in the wrong, but Brady should take a 1-game suspension anyway just to get things over with, and by the way Brady's stories about why he didn't turn over his phone aren't wholly consistent.
- The NFL's actions were ridiculous from beginning to end.
- However, Brady's probably guilty of SOMETHING minor.
- Like other sports with concepts of fouls and penalties from contact during continuous play, football has a strong element of "Get away with whatever you can".
- In football, teams engage in injury-report shenanigans all the time. The Patriots are among the ringleaders.
- Football and many other sports have long legacies of PED violations.
- In sports where equipment violations are helpful, there commonly are long histories of equipment violations. For extreme example, consider NASCAR and Americas Cup yachting, which not coincidentally are among the sports with the most complex equipment overall. Football has such a history.
- When the rules are vague and poorly enforced, it's natural to try to push their boundaries.
But people who think Brady is a LITTLE BIT dirtier than that aren't necessarily being idiots. So I think it's OK to take note of people who have views approximately along these lines.
For starters, Steve Buckley is now in that camp, and whatever negative things I thought about his previous views, his current ones don't make me want to vomit, although I don't like that he still assumes the footballs were illicitly deflated.
http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/...ey_obsessed_nfl_bigger_culprit_than_tom_brady
I still say Brady “did it,” even if I’m a little vague as to what, exactly, he did.
No, he didn’t let the air out of the footballs. But whether it was via text, email, snail mail, telegram, telephone, smoke signals or a wink and a nod, Brady was “generally aware” of what was going on.
And I believe he should be fined $50 and forced to spend a Saturday morning at Safe Quarterbacking School down at the local high school.
... I'm starting to hear, off in the distance, the faint baying of hounds from the NFL’s witch hunt. And I can see the torches.
Why the National Football League is so obsessed with this case remains Mystery Science Fiction Theater. That’s why the urbandictionary.com phraseology works so well: Roger Goodell and his crew are going after Brady for “reasons that are not necessarily tangible.”
Maybe they’re just nuts. Everything is in play these days.
Edit: Similarly Chris Gasper -- https://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/...ot-possible/ZXpVFrWioaya9jOCw4pT0N/story.html -- who thinks Goodell is totally in the wrong, but Brady should take a 1-game suspension anyway just to get things over with, and by the way Brady's stories about why he didn't turn over his phone aren't wholly consistent.
Last edited: