- Joined
- Sep 1, 2010
- Messages
- 30,775
- Reaction score
- 38,038
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.It's a miracle the 2006 New England Patriots won twelve games with this wide receiver corps:I don't think there's anyway they can afford to let Welker walk, they've gone down that road in 2006 and it probably cost them a Lombardi.
I would give him a 2 year deal.If he doesnt accept it then go after someone in the free agent market.
What kind of stats do you expect from Welker four seasons from now?
Well whoever would be offering him that contract would have to worry about it, and it's irresponsible moves like this that got the Jets where they are today.To be honest I don't care about his stats 4 years from now
Well whoever would be offering him that contract would have to worry about it, and it's irresponsible moves like this that got the Jets where they are today.
Well whoever would be offering him that contract would have to worry about it, and it's irresponsible moves like this that got the Jets where they are today.
What should the Pats have done this past offseason that would have been better? Having him play a year under the franchise tender is definitely better than handing him that $40M over 4 years then.If the Patriots had been smarter about a Welker contract last season, they wouldn't need to worry about year 4 of a new contract after this season. Also, the Patriots were looking to sign the considerably older Reggie Wayne in this past offseason, so let's not go down the "irresponsible" path...
What should the Pats have done this past offseason that would have been better? Having him play a year under the franchise tender is definitely better than handing him that $40M over 4 years then.
Wayne being old (for a WR) is the only similarity between him and Welker. He got the kind of contract you give an old WR, one that you can get out of for good value after any number of years. If he had bombed this year and would be cut this offseason, then he would have made $8.5M and have $5M in dead money. A year later, and he makes $13.5M and has $2.5M in dead money. If he plays out the whole thing, he gets $17.5M in three years. That's under $6M a year and $2.5M a year guaranteed. That's a responsible old WR contract. $10M a year with $6M a year guaranteed is not.
Actually Sciz there is nothing irresponsible about wanting Welker to help them win championships more just out up numbers, and coming from you the statement is pretty ridiculous, as nothing in this arena has been more irresponsible than your yearly clamor to get rid of him for a frigging 2nd round draft pick.
I'll take care of these two together, since they're basically the same thing.And I am really surprised you chimed in on this Sciz, I would have thought that after being so very wrong for so very long on this issue you would have either acknowledged your many mistakes or just kept quiet. At least some others had the good sense to come to grips with the error of their ways.
It's not about pure age. Wayne has been plenty productive at 34. But had he not been, it was easy for the Colts to get rid of him with minimal loss ($5M). We don't know if Welker will be productive at 34. Heck, we don't know if he'll be productive at 32. The key there is that regardless of age, the Colts had an easy out of Wayne's contract, where nobody is proposing a Welker contract that has an easy out until it's over.Wayne will be 35 in November. Welker will be 32 next May.
The reality is that, even with a 4 year deal, which is not something I recommended, Welker's contract would still be ending with him at age 34, which means that it would be ending with him at the same age where Wayne's new contract is starting.
Instead of the two-year contract you propose, the Pats could instead have offered 2 years, $20.933M with $9.515M guaranteed. Heck, they still can do that. That's what he gets if the Pats franchise him again. There's no motivation on the Pats' end to offer him more than $9.5M guaranteed up front except to change the yearly cap hit split from $9.5 and then $11.4M to something more even.As for what the Patriots should have done, they should have adapted to the changed WR market:
2 years 20-21, 15 guaranteed
3 years 24-30, 16-20 guaranteed (I'd have looked at 3/24-3/27 as the expected range)
Either of the above could have been offered and, since they'd already franchised him, the 2 year deal would have been a low offer anyway, but would have given Welker a bit more security without ramping his price up higher than the double franchise tag. Reportedly, they never budged off of 2 years 16, which was an insult.
As opposed to Visanthe Shiancoe's participation in the Miami Dolphins game this past Sunday?Personally, I'm looking forward to New England Patriots tight end Visanthe Shiancoe returning for calendar year 2013. Tight end Jake Ballard hasn't even played a game yet! And as we all know, you can't make the club from the tub!
It's not about pure age. Wayne has been plenty productive at 34. But had he not been, it was easy for the Colts to get rid of him with minimal loss ($5M). We don't know if Welker will be productive at 34. Heck, we don't know if he'll be productive at 32. The key there is that regardless of age, the Colts had an easy out of Wayne's contract, where nobody is proposing a Welker contract that has an easy out until it's over.
Instead of the two-year contract you propose, the Pats could instead have offered 2 years, $20.933M with $9.515M guaranteed. Heck, they still can do that. That's what he gets if the Pats franchise him again. There's no motivation on the Pats' end to offer him more than $9.5M guaranteed up front except to change the yearly cap hit split from $9.5 and then $11.4M to something more even.
Depending on where in those ranges you end up, Welker is gaining one year, $8-14M, and $0-4 guaranteed. At the low end, it's another non-guaranteed year added onto the $16M/2yr proposal from the Pats. If you think that (or a little more) is enough that Welker would have accepted it, then I think it could definitely be arranged to be a pretty good deal on both ends. I just don't think Welker would be too quick to accept it unless he's getting closer to the $30M than the $27M.
As opposed to Visanthe Shiancoe's participation in the Miami Dolphins game this past Sunday?
Snaps: Ridley's second wind - New England Patriots Blog - ESPN Boston
Well whoever would be offering him that contract would have to worry about it, and it's irresponsible moves like this that got the Jets where they are today.
Brady was 28 in 2006 and they got a first round pick back for Branch, who wasn't anywhere near as productive for the Patriots as Welker has been. They also had a solid defense back then, and didn't have to pretty much rely solely on the offense to win them games. Not really comparable situations.
What kind of stats do you expect from Welker four seasons from now?