In Light of the Mitchell Steroid Report, is Santana More, or Less, Valuable Now? - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
In Light of the Mitchell Steroid Report, is Santana More, or Less, Valuable Now?
Within a year or two we'll be back to like baseball was like in the early 90's, with lots more skinny and regular sized batters at the plate. Facing diminished hitting power, an ace pitcher can control the game even more than he could over the past 5 years.
Last edited by maverick4; 12-13-2007 at 02:49 PM..
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: In Light of the Mitchell Steroid Report, is Santana More or Less Valuable?
Their are alot of pitchers on that report. Clemens, Pettitte, Gagne, most of the real dominant pitchers of that time.
__________________
The Jets look like a Super Bowl contender right now about as much as Rosie O’Donnell looks like a threat for the Miss America crown. -NY Post 12/19/2011
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: In Light of the Mitchell Steroid Report, Santana is Even More Valuable
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdaniels7114
Edit: Let me re-phrase, Steroids help batters more, therefore taking steroids away helps pitchers.
But with overall less power all around the league, doesn't that make the difference between an average and a great pitcher much smaller, and thus less valuable?
Re: In Light of the Mitchell Steroid Report, is Santana More, or Less, Valuable Now?
In the steroids era there was lots of power all around so it took real great pitching talent to mow down a quality batting lineup, whereas an average pitcher had a greater chance of getting eaten alive.
In the post-steroids era where a lot less guys will hit for as much average or power, doesn't this diminish the distance between average and great pitchers? Great pitchers will still be great but average pitchers won't get burned as often now on extra base hits, HR's, and such.
Last edited by maverick4; 12-13-2007 at 03:15 PM..
Re: In Light of the Mitchell Steroid Report, is Santana More, or Less, Valuable Now?
I don't think the changes are going to be as drastic as a lot of people think. For one, HGH isn't going to go away anytime soon, or at least not until there is an effective method of testing for it. Also, steroids or not, today's ballplayers on average are much better athletes than in years past. There's no doubt that HR numbers will decline as they have in the last few years. but it's not like we're about to enter into another "dead ball" era like the 80s.