10-22-2012, 05:40 PM
|
#3
|
|
In the Starting Line-up
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,061
|
Re: Was time on New York Jets' side?
-Regarding the beginning of the kickoff return, you're talking about maybe a one second delay- pretty standard. Beyond that I hardly think the clock operator had the clairvoyance to know what was going to happen and that it would ultimately benefit the Pats.
-It seems like the clock operator was off by a few seconds and it should have run down the the 2-minute warning. However, the clock operator should be on the field, because had the whistle been blown when the Jets player got possession and was down by contact, there actually was 2:01.
-Pats sill would have gotten the ball back with the same amount of time but one less timeout. This isn't like the Jets could have run the clock down to 0:40 and kicked a field goal. Patriots gameplan would have changed, as they would have gone for more sideline plays to get out of bounds. The way it played out, the Jets gave them inside routes, seemlingly to protect the sidelines.
-Overall, a very, very weak excuse from the Jets. The Pats lost games this year on some terrible calls that were blatant. I would take a one second clock error over some horrendous, game-changing officiating multiple times during a given game.
|
|
|