Was time on New York Jets' side? - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree12Likes

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-22-2012, 05:30 PM   #1
In the Starting Line-up
 
Kid~Brady's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,251
My Mood: Cheerful
Default Was time on New York Jets' side?

Here we go, Jet fans making excuses about the time clock.

Quote:
Does the clock operator at Gillette Stadium deserve credit for the New England Patriots' late comeback against the New York Jets on Sunday night?

That's what some Gang Green conspiracy theorists seem to believe when it comes to Devin McCourty's late fumble that set up New York's go-ahead score.

Quote:
The NFL reviewed the play and determined there was no clock-operator error, a league spokesman said Monday, according to Rich Cimini of ESPNNewYork.com.

link: Was time on New York Jets' side? Maybe not vs. Pats - NFL.com
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Kid~Brady is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 10-22-2012, 05:38 PM   #2
In the Starting Line-up
 
robbomango's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: living in Oregon grew up in Revere MA
Posts: 2,428
Default Re: Was time on New York Jets' side?

Quote:
What do you think? A desperate theory concocted by a crushed fan base? Or did the Patriots get the advantage of some home cooking in a big spot?
The former of course..

Last edited by robbomango; 10-22-2012 at 05:39 PM..
robbomango is offline  
Old 10-22-2012, 05:40 PM   #3
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,061
Default Re: Was time on New York Jets' side?

-Regarding the beginning of the kickoff return, you're talking about maybe a one second delay- pretty standard. Beyond that I hardly think the clock operator had the clairvoyance to know what was going to happen and that it would ultimately benefit the Pats.

-It seems like the clock operator was off by a few seconds and it should have run down the the 2-minute warning. However, the clock operator should be on the field, because had the whistle been blown when the Jets player got possession and was down by contact, there actually was 2:01.

-Pats sill would have gotten the ball back with the same amount of time but one less timeout. This isn't like the Jets could have run the clock down to 0:40 and kicked a field goal. Patriots gameplan would have changed, as they would have gone for more sideline plays to get out of bounds. The way it played out, the Jets gave them inside routes, seemlingly to protect the sidelines.

-Overall, a very, very weak excuse from the Jets. The Pats lost games this year on some terrible calls that were blatant. I would take a one second clock error over some horrendous, game-changing officiating multiple times during a given game.
Ice_Ice_Brady is offline  
Old 10-22-2012, 06:08 PM   #4
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
BradyFTW!'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 13,710
My Mood: Doh
Default Re: Was time on New York Jets' side?

Is there are a sorer bunch of losers than Jets fans? You'd think that, through 40 uninterrupted years of losing, they would learn to do it with a bit of dignity.

They're complaining more about this than we complained about the Ravens loss, which actually could be blamed on officiating (and was by many neutral observers).
BradyFTW! is offline  
Old 10-22-2012, 07:01 PM   #5
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
supafly's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 8,085
Default Re: Was time on New York Jets' side?

Let's see, so far the Jets and their fanbase having whined about the following issues:

--taping from the wrong area (even though the NEP have plenty of stories of their own with the Jets doing this, and to deeper extremes)

--the "illegal" use of our no-huddle (funny how no one else has ever had a problem with it)

--the clock operator having screwed up some minor matter of a second or two

It doesn't seem to me like they want to just shut up and try to learn from their mistakes. I wouldn't even be remotely surprised if I found out that someone on the Jets staff alerted the NFL to Belichick's all blue hoodie yesterday. They complain about anything and everything, it's pathetic.

Just hearing this stuff today makes the win that much sweeter.
goheels22002 likes this.
__________________
Patiently waiting to defend the next "bubble" player in this summer's training camp.....

Last edited by supafly; 10-22-2012 at 07:01 PM..
supafly is offline  
Old 10-22-2012, 07:12 PM   #6
BSR
In the Starting Line-up
 
BSR's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,501
Default Re: Was time on New York Jets' side?

What is really pathetic is that the New York media would actually pick this up. Its one thing for a small contingent of a team's fan base to whine about a call, but rarely if ever does the media roll with it.
BSR is offline  
Old 10-22-2012, 07:14 PM   #7
BSR
In the Starting Line-up
 
BSR's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,501
Default Re: Was time on New York Jets' side?

Quote:
Originally Posted by supafly View Post
Let's see, so far the Jets and their fanbase having whined about the following issues:

--taping from the wrong area (even though the NEP have plenty of stories of their own with the Jets doing this, and to deeper extremes)

--the "illegal" use of our no-huddle (funny how no one else has ever had a problem with it)

--the clock operator having screwed up some minor matter of a second or two

It doesn't seem to me like they want to just shut up and try to learn from their mistakes. I wouldn't even be remotely surprised if I found out that someone on the Jets staff alerted the NFL to Belichick's all blue hoodie yesterday. They complain about anything and everything, it's pathetic.

Just hearing this stuff today makes the win that much sweeter.
You forgot about how we somehow were to blame for the Jet's coach tripping a dolphin's player.
BSR is offline  
Old 10-22-2012, 07:16 PM   #8
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
fgssand's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Foxboro
Posts: 4,646
My Mood: Psychedelic
Default Re: Was time on New York Jets' side?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyFTW! View Post
Is there are a sorer bunch of losers than Jets fans? You'd think that, through 40 uninterrupted years of losing, they would learn to do it with a bit of dignity..
Dignity?? Jet fans....LO freaking L.

One would think they have become totally used to losing by now, they do it quite well.
__________________
Season ticket holder since 1971, first in section 209 and now in 134.

LOVE New England sports....10 years SEVEN championships!!!
fgssand is offline  
Old 10-22-2012, 07:21 PM   #9
Moderator
 
jmt57's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,198
Blog Entries: 20
Default Re: Was time on New York Jets' side?

Considering the circumstances (score and possession at the time of the kickoff), if the clock operator was attempting to help the Patriots then he would have done the opposite and had more time come off the clock, not less.




By the way the NFL Network is run almost exclusively by former espn executives, and it shows in their approach that creating controversy sells; that same business decision seems to be fueling NFL.com as well.
Joker, PatsFanJess and Kid~Brady like this.
jmt57 is offline  
Old 10-22-2012, 07:26 PM   #10
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsDeb's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,203
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Was time on New York Jets' side?

But here's the problem with their theory (who is this guy by the way, who says, "Hey' there's a controversy here, even though there isn't, as the league already said there was no clock error.") - Brady had to wait at least five seconds at the end of the drive, to call the Pats' last time out. They weren't out of time at any point during that drive. If the Pats got down to the 30 yd. line with one second left and then quickly called time out their theory might have legs, but that is not what happened. As a matter of fact, I recall there was about 1:40 on the clock when we got the ball back, way past the 2 minute warning.
PatsDeb is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563