Re-thinking the defensive line/player predictions - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree3Likes

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-16-2012, 12:25 AM   #1
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
supafly's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 8,290
Default Re-thinking the defensive line/player predictions

As guys like Fanane, Pryor, and G.Warren are nowhere to be seen so far, what is the general consensus for defensive line positional predictions as we move into a period to wrap up the last 3 preseason games (10 day period starting Monday vs PHI)?

I'm guessing 16 myself for front seven:

1.Wilfork
2.Deaderick
3.Love
4.Ninkovich
5.Mayo
6.Cunningham
7.Brace
8.Bequette
9.Hightower
10.Jones
11.Scott
12.Spikes
13.Francis

14.Either one OR two of Carpenter, Tarpinian, T.White as our "coverage" LB(s) who will also play special teams. That will either take us up to 14 or 15.

There's a big difference between 14 and 15 though, as we certainly would need more big bodies for the front line.

I'm not as worried about Pryor myself, as I am about Fanane.

Warren was already a bubble/shadow roster player as it was, but has use in run heavy packages and has experience in this system--especially if Fanane and Pryor end up on PUP (EDIT: as mayoclinic correctly points out, Fanane has already taken practice reps in TC, therefore making him ineligible for PUP...so that's my mistake)

Obviously the popular thought will be that either: one or more of these guys will not be out for too long + the idea of picking up another teams' castoff.

At any rate, we seem to have a slight problem with some depth on the defensive line if more than one of these guys is expected to miss any time. It could have been argued that we needed more depth and competition before this too.
__________________
Patiently waiting to defend the next "bubble" player in this summer's training camp.....

Last edited by supafly; 08-16-2012 at 01:07 AM..
supafly is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 08-16-2012, 01:44 AM   #2
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
Fencer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,424
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Re-thinking the defensive line/player predictions

My take.

Heavies

2 needed at once; need endurance to deal with double-teams. Would need 3 in a 3-4 base.

1.Wilfork
2.Deaderick
3.Love
7.Brace


At least one more is needed; if that's your point, you're absolutely correct. I'd say Fanene, then Warren.

Lighter ends and rushing-specialist LBs
2 needed at once; traditionally this is an endurance-need/rotate-the-guys role

4.Ninkovich
6.Cunningham
8.Bequette
10.Jones
11.Scott
13.Francis


6 is a nice to have. Not sure if it's absolutely needed. Is Francis that good? Will Andre Carter be available at the Pats' price? Does also provide LB depth, and perhaps 3 of these tuys might play at once.

Unarguably LBs
3 needed on base-package downs, 2 otherwise (and in some but not all 3-4 base configurations)

5.Mayo
9.Hightower
12.Spikes
14.Either one OR two of Carpenter, Tarpinian, T.White as our "coverage" LB(s) who will also play special teams.


I say 2 of the STers, else things get thin the moment Spikes is hurt again.
__________________
"To lose one parent may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose both looks like carelessness." -- Oscar Wilde

Last edited by Fencer; 08-16-2012 at 01:47 AM..
Fencer is offline  
Old 08-16-2012, 01:59 AM   #3
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
supafly's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 8,290
Default Re: Re-thinking the defensive line/player predictions

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fencer View Post
My take.

Heavies

2 needed at once; need endurance to deal with double-teams. Would need 3 in a 3-4 base.

1.Wilfork
2.Deaderick
3.Love
7.Brace


At least one more is needed; if that's your point, you're absolutely correct. I'd say Fanene, then Warren.

Lighter ends and rushing-specialist LBs
2 needed at once; traditionally this is an endurance-need/rotate-the-guys role

4.Ninkovich
6.Cunningham
8.Bequette
10.Jones
11.Scott
13.Francis


6 is a nice to have. Not sure if it's absolutely needed. Is Francis that good? Will Andre Carter be available at the Pats' price? Does also provide LB depth, and perhaps 3 of these tuys might play at once.

Unarguably LBs
3 needed on base-package downs, 2 otherwise (and in some but not all 3-4 base configurations)

5.Mayo
9.Hightower
12.Spikes
14.Either one OR two of Carpenter, Tarpinian, T.White as our "coverage" LB(s) who will also play special teams.


I say 2 of the STers, else things get thin the moment Spikes is hurt again.
I am thinking 2 of the ST LB'ers myself, Fencer. I think that Carpenter is looking pretty good for a spot, and was seen calling plays from the defensive huddle today. More assignments can often lead to a better chance of making the team, especially in Carpenter's situation with Fletcher being out now.

The other position will likely be a battle between Tarpinian and White, as White is finally healthy. That will certainly be one to keep an eye on.

For the 6 lighter ends/rushing specialists I just have a gut feeling that Cunningham gets a chance to stay another year. If not, it will likely come down to Cunningham vs Scott in my opinion.

At any rate I still see 16 front seven players, with an additional big body added--whether or not Fanane is fine. That could also raise competition for Brace too. I personally don't see Carter coming back unless it is into the regular season, which is a possibility. Warren should be a close phone call away too, or will be signed after the 1st game to avoid the guaranteed salary (what they did last yr IIRC). Pryor will likely be a PUP spot, seeing as how he hasn't had any TC reps + the fact that we could possibly use an interior sub guy later in the season.

That would leave 9 DB's to make 25 on defense total.
__________________
Patiently waiting to defend the next "bubble" player in this summer's training camp.....
supafly is offline  
Old 08-16-2012, 02:06 AM   #4
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,114
Default Re: Re-thinking the defensive line/player predictions

Quote:
Originally Posted by supafly View Post
For the 6 lighter ends/rushing specialists I just have a gut feeling that Cunningham gets a chance to stay another year. If not, it will likely come down to Cunningham vs Scott in my opinion.
Based on the Saints game I'd say Cunningham is pretty much a lock at this point. He was the first DE off the bench and was effective rushing the passer and holding up against the run. He also lined up at DT on passing downs a couple times.
Marqui is offline  
Old 08-16-2012, 11:16 AM   #5
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,191
Default Re: Re-thinking the defensive line/player predictions

I agree with you comments.

HEAVIES (5)
We need at least five. Fanene is my #5, although the position could go to Warren.
Wilfork, Deaderick, Love, Brace, Fanene, (Warren)

LIGHTER DE'S AND PASS-RUSHING OLB'S (5)
Francis is the odd man out. Scott and Cunningham have done well enough to stay.
Ninkovich, Jones, Bequette, Cunningham, Scott

UNARGUABLY LINEBACKERS (4)
Carpenter competed with Fletcher for the fourth spot. It is now his.
Mayo, Hightower, Spikes, Carpenter

SPECIAL TEAMS (1)
Niko seems to be the best choice at this point. This give us 2 LB/ST specialists: Carpenter and Koutouvides.

NUMBER 16 (1)
This could go to a 6th DT (Warren), a developmental player (Francis) or a Special Teamer (White, Tarpinian or even a safety). Personally, I would chose Warren. There always seems to be an injury at DT.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fencer View Post
My take.

Heavies

2 needed at once; need endurance to deal with double-teams. Would need 3 in a 3-4 base.

1.Wilfork
2.Deaderick
3.Love
7.Brace


At least one more is needed; if that's your point, you're absolutely correct. I'd say Fanene, then Warren.

Lighter ends and rushing-specialist LBs
4.Ninkovich
6.Cunningham
8.Bequette
10.Jones
11.Scott
13.Francis


6 is a nice to have. Not sure if it's absolutely needed. Is Francis that good? Will Andre Carter be available at the Pats' price? Does also provide LB depth, and perhaps 3 of these tuys might play at once.

Unarguably LBs
3 needed on base-package downs, 2 otherwise (and in some but not all 3-4 base configurations)

5.Mayo
9.Hightower
12.Spikes
14.Either one OR two of Carpenter, Tarpinian, T.White as our "coverage" LB(s) who will also play special teams.


I say 2 of the STers, else things get thin the moment Spikes is hurt again.
mgteich is offline  
Old 08-16-2012, 11:22 AM   #6
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,778
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Re-thinking the defensive line/player predictions

I don't know how bad the injury to Fanene is but short of IR there is no way I see him left off this roster.
Ivan is offline  
Old 08-16-2012, 11:34 AM   #7
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
BradyManny's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,304
Default Re: Re-thinking the defensive line/player predictions

Geez, I forgot about Fanene.

When did he last practice? Minicamps when he tweeked something?
BradyManny is offline  
Old 08-16-2012, 11:57 AM   #8
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
signbabybrady's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Foxboro
Posts: 8,319
My Mood: Buzzed
Default Re: Re-thinking the defensive line/player predictions

Not sure you guys were doing this with any sort of order in mind but I found it interesting all three of you wrote Wilfork, Deadrick, then Love. To me the two best DL we have wide bodied or not right now are Wilfork and Love.

I dont think people realize how good Love is he had a real good year last year and looks confident and is a beast out there. I think he had 4 sacks last year and would think that number will be about the same but I think he will be a better all around player. I think he seems to be stronger and more stout and I expect his reps will go up somewhat from last year.

I said widebodied or not so hopefully he quickly becomes 3 behind Vince and Jones but right now I say 2.
__________________
"We go down to New Orleans, and ain't anybody give us a chance? Nobody! And what did we say to them?"

"DON'T TALK TO ME!!!"
signbabybrady is online now  
Old 08-16-2012, 12:03 PM   #9
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
BradyFTW!'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 13,813
My Mood: Doh
Default Re: Re-thinking the defensive line/player predictions

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich View Post
I agree with you comments.

HEAVIES (5)
We need at least five. Fanene is my #5, although the position could go to Warren.
Wilfork, Deaderick, Love, Brace, Fanene, (Warren)

LIGHTER DE'S AND PASS-RUSHING OLB'S (5)
Francis is the odd man out. Scott and Cunningham have done well enough to stay.
Ninkovich, Jones, Bequette, Cunningham, Scott

UNARGUABLY LINEBACKERS (4)
Carpenter competed with Fletcher for the fourth spot. It is now his.
Mayo, Hightower, Spikes, Carpenter

SPECIAL TEAMS (1)
Niko seems to be the best choice at this point. This give us 2 LB/ST specialists: Carpenter and Koutouvides.

NUMBER 16 (1)
This could go to a 6th DT (Warren), a developmental player (Francis) or a Special Teamer (White, Tarpinian or even a safety). Personally, I would chose Warren. There always seems to be an injury at DT.
I agree that 16 should probably go to a DT, but I also wouldn't be at all surprised to see Francis beat out Scott, or even Cunningham if his resurgence has been overstated.
BradyFTW! is offline  
Old 08-16-2012, 12:11 PM   #10
Moderatrix
 
patchick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 10,336
Default Re: Re-thinking the defensive line/player predictions

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivan View Post
I don't know how bad the injury to Fanene is but short of IR there is no way I see him left off this roster.
Yep, a lot of short memories here. By all accounts Fanene had a great start to camp, and there's still plenty of time for him to come back. With Pryor presumably on PUP, Fanene's the one real inside rusher on the team and an extremely valuable moving part. Plus the combo of a $3.85 signing bonus and $900k salary = lock.

Here's how I have it, based on the latest we've seen:

Locks/Near-Locks
DT/3-4 DE: Wilfork, Love, Fanene, Deaderick
DE/3-4 OLB: Jones, Ninkovich, Cunningham, Bequette
LB: Mayo, Spikes, Hightower, Carpenter

Most Likely Final Spots:
DT/3-4 DE: Brace (Warren on shadow roster)
DE/3-4 OLB: Scott (he's pretty cheap, and my guess is Francis makes the PS)
LB: Tarpinian (this is an ST-first slot, and the coaches see to love him there)
Ivan likes this.
patchick is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Defensive player maybe be given helmet radio - Which Pat should be our Defensive QB? JoeSixPat PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 21 03-27-2006 09:00 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC