CHFF: Harsh, but accurate assessment - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-22-2008, 01:06 PM   #1
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 17,580
My Mood: Grumpy
Default CHFF: Harsh, but accurate assessment

CHFF sums up the problem with SD's game plan.

Quote:
We laid out the baby-blueprint last week that San Diego must follow if it were to shock New England in the AFC championship game.

The Chargers instead suffered a catastrophic failure, . . .
I'd quote more, but I don't want to spoil their choice of picture, which is just about perfect.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is online now  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-22-2008, 02:23 PM   #2
All Pro Poster
 
upstater1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 11,794
Default Re: CHFF: Harsh, but accurate assessment

Duh, forget what I wrote lol.

Last edited by upstater1; 01-22-2008 at 02:42 PM..
upstater1 is online now  
Old 01-22-2008, 02:26 PM   #3
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,942
Default Re: CHFF: Harsh, but accurate assessment

Quote:
Originally Posted by upstater1 View Post
Someone needs a lesson in math.

21 points - 9 points from field goals = 12 points + 3 points for 4th field goal = 15 points = loss.

In other words, the baby blueprint--as with all other blueprints--was a failure.
Um, no. It wouldn't add to the total, but it would've made 24 points, enough to defeat the Patriots.
primetime is online now  
Old 01-22-2008, 02:30 PM   #4
eom
In the Starting Line-up
 
eom's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,535
My Mood: Asleep
Default Re: CHFF: Harsh, but accurate assessment

dude..........I don't want to be the one to bring you the bad news, but in order to get the 6 points you actually have to get it into the endzone.
that's kind of the whole point of football.

now, if wishing the chargers got 40 more points in your fantasies helps you cope, then don't let me be the thought police.
maybe add a few hot chicks in the mix, while you're rollin'.

edit: yeah, htf does converting 3 field goals into td's add 21 points, dumbass??

Last edited by eom; 01-22-2008 at 02:33 PM..
eom is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 02:36 PM   #5
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 938
Default Re: CHFF: Harsh, but accurate assessment

So, the Chargers score more and go up 24-21. Then the Pats decide to run a 9 minute drive in which they take a knee in the final two minutes and lose 24-21.

Wow, we barely escaped.

Face it, this was not really even a 9 point game -- Pats took a knee in easy FG range.
onegameatatime is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 02:40 PM   #6
All Pro Poster
 
VJCPatriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,640
Default Re: CHFF: Harsh, but accurate assessment

Quote:
Originally Posted by primetime View Post
Um, no. It wouldn't add to the total, but it would've made 24 points, enough to defeat the Patriots.
No it wouldn't have.
Is there any doubt that on the last drive if the Pats had wanted to they could have scored a touchdown?
Not to me.
The Pats could have won it 28-12 if they had wanted to, but felt no need to run up the score when the contest was well in hand and the Chargers had 0 timeouts left.

So if you're going to give the Chargers 3 woulda coulda TD's, I think it's more than fair to give NE the nearly certain extra TD on that final drive. The Final Score would have been Pats 28 - Chargers 24 if everything had gone the Chargers way and the Pats simply finished off their final drive in the 4th quarter.

Sounds to me like the "baby blueprint" is more like "baby bullsh$t."
There is NO blueprint to beat the Perfect Patriots this season.
__________________
Pats NEW LOOK Offense

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Weapons Galore!

Last edited by VJCPatriot; 01-22-2008 at 02:41 PM..
VJCPatriot is online now  
Old 01-22-2008, 02:44 PM   #7
On the Roster
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 82
Default Re: CHFF: Harsh, but accurate assessment

Quote:
Originally Posted by primetime View Post
Um, no. It wouldn't add to the total, but it would've made 24 points, enough to defeat the Patriots.
I don't agree that 24 points would have been enough, the Patriots were still driving down the end. I'm pretty sure they wouldn't have been taking knees in field goal range with 3 TO's left.

Also, if you're going to argue that you should just get credit for TDs in the red zone, you'd need to add 7 points to our total for the INT we had in the red zone.
MTaylorJ1 is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 02:48 PM   #8
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,942
Default Re: CHFF: Harsh, but accurate assessment

Quote:
Originally Posted by VJCPatriot View Post
No it wouldn't have.
Is there any doubt that on the last drive if the Pats had wanted to they could have scored a touchdown?
For the record, I wasn't saying the Chargers would've won anyways (I know "enough to defeat the Patriots" sounds like I meant that, but... yeah), just that the upstater's math was off too, and 24 is more than 21. The Patriots would have scored again at the end, and the Chargers did not convert any, let alone all, of their chances in the red zone.

Last edited by primetime; 01-22-2008 at 02:49 PM..
primetime is online now  
Old 01-22-2008, 03:38 PM   #9
In the Starting Line-up
 
Oswlek's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,389
Default Re: CHFF: Harsh, but accurate assessment

Since when is a 26 yard run against prevent defense just before the half a "big play"?

Everything that they said was basically common sense. Score in the red zone, defend the pass against the best passing team in the league, make "big plays".

The problem is, when you can't talk nitty-gritty, it all sounds about the same.
__________________
"They have one objective," said Washington cornerback Shawn Springs. "They whoop people's [backsides]. If you understand that, it answers all your questions. They might not lose [this year]."
Oswlek is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC