8/25 Roster Prediction - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-26-2007, 10:22 AM   #11
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsWickedPissah's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Hampster!
Posts: 19,502
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: 8/25 Roster Prediction

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsRI View Post
The question is if guys like Gutierrez and Lua could make it through to the practice squad without other teams taking them.
Lua was lucky to be drafted. He'll make it thru easily.

Gutz is ONLY at risk because of a dearth of #3 QB prospects and the cache of being a possible sleeper pick by the genius Belioli.

Other teams are making tough decisions for their 53 cuting their own rookie prospects.
__________________
"Would I rather have my phone records collected and inspected by the National Security Agency, or have my genitalia handled and scrutinized by the Transportation Security Administration? Why choose? In today’s America you can have both."
PatsWickedPissah is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 08-26-2007, 10:58 AM   #12
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,191
Default Re: 8/25 Roster Prediction

My adjustments

1) Yates instead of Mruczkowksi
I do also want Mruc if Yates needs to go on IR. But if Yates is 3-4 weeks away, there is no harm in him being on the roster. The 9th OL is for emergencies later in the year.

2) Rogers instead of Chad Brown
This is close, and I have no real issues with Chad Brown being on the 53.

3) Wesley (or James) instead of Richardson
Richardson will easily make it to the Practice Squad. He may go to IR. We need the additional experience on the 53.

4) James (or Jackson or Rivers) instead of Gaffney
I see no reason for six receivers, unless we need to give Jackson a spot. Caldwell may be valuable early in the year while Jackson and Brown recover from their injuries. Gaffney won't be useful early Jackson WILL be back, or the patriots will lose a grievance. He may need to be the 6th receiver now.

I would keep four tight ends if Thomas is given a roster spot. We can always sign Gaffney later when he is healthy.

Last edited by mgteich; 08-26-2007 at 10:59 AM..
mgteich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2007, 12:58 PM   #13
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,154
Default Re: 8/25 Roster Prediction

I too think Rodgers is chosen over C Brown.

But I think you guys don't consider the Shadow roster fully. What is it? What do you need to be and STAY (!) a candidate?

I think most of all a willingness to try for a ring. Secondly willingness to bypass other offers, or to not have any other offers, but still be useful to the Patriots. How can that be? A player useful to the the Sb contender but not useful to a n Oakland? If you are deemed "over the hill" and done; or you play a position that needs some acclimation before you can be useful. Having played for or trained with a Team makes that much more possible, to be immediately useful.

I think the typical Shadow Roster guy is an aged ex-starter veteran, who is trying to get a last season, and or ring in his last season. Either that of a ping-pong ball younger guy who has bounced off and on the roster several times, like a Hank Poteat. But these guys are more likely to be called "street free agents" than true Shadow roster candidates, unless they have TRAINED with you as well.

This year there are an inordinate number of Shadow roster candidates that have played with or trained with the Patriots, of the ex-veteran starter type guys, who could give you a game or three, or more likely a few plays per game, of good quality.

Let look at them position by position:

QB Vinny Testaverde
RB Corey Dillon, Patrick Pass
TE (but David Thomas on PUP; Kyle Brady if he is weeks away and cut)
OL Gene Mruczkowski ( Or Hochstein if weeks away and cut)
WR Troy Brown and CJ if off PUP eventually

DL Rashad Moore if he is cut; Kenny Brown
LB Chad Brown if he is cut
CB Samuels if he holds out or Tory James if he is cut
S Hawkins and whoever is cut
ST Hawkins, or Izzo if he is cut, or another DB cut.
P Josh Miller
K Street FA

The Patriots may have arranged it so that they have a Shadow roster candidate at EVERY position, save kicker. The Pats have arranged so that there is a valid, TRAINED, and useful veteran most likely available to them, in the even of need. This is above and beyond the usual PS suspects, and street Free Agents for this year's Super Bowl push. The only position not potentially covered is Kicker, and there are always a few free agents available there. "No holes anywhere, anytime" is Bill Belichick's philosophy, and he and Scott are working it to perfection, much more so than ever before, IMHO.

And we haven't considered the PUP list thoroughly, either. Welcome to the benefits of the 53; plus 8 PS; plus 11 shadow roster; Plus 5 PUP roster.

That adds up to 77 man roster. It's almost unafair and yet valid buy the rulesand still $8 million under the cap. How can others compete with a roster innovation of that "depth"?

This insight should help illuminate some decisions on final cut downs for you. E.g. Vinny Testaverde, Chad Brown, Kyle Brady, and Larry Izzo might not be all that surprising cuts, if you plan on having them back in a few weeks...

Last edited by AzPatsFan; 08-26-2007 at 01:25 PM..
AzPatsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2007, 02:37 PM   #14
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
Sean Pa Patriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hazleton Pa , for now
Posts: 8,218
My Mood: Mellow
Default Re: 8/25 Roster Prediction

Tory James for Mike Richardson, and Rodgers for Chad Brown, with Reche Caldwell being a big if right now.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



We going to take it one game at a time
Sean Pa Patriot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2007, 03:49 PM   #15
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,642
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: 8/25 Roster Prediction

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich View Post
My adjustments

1) Yates instead of Mruczkowksi
I do also want Mruc if Yates needs to go on IR. But if Yates is 3-4 weeks away, there is no harm in him being on the roster. The 9th OL is for emergencies later in the year. Yates was on the field during the Carolina game. I believe he lined up at LG with Mruczkowski at center and Elgin at RG.

2) Rogers instead of Chad Brown
This is close, and I have no real issues with Chad Brown being on the 53.

3) Wesley (or James) instead of Richardson
Richardson will easily make it to the Practice Squad. He may go to IR. We need the additional experience on the 53. Not sure that I agree that we need the additional experience on the 53. Not when you have Samuel, Hobbs and Gay in front of Richardson.

4) James (or Jackson or Rivers) instead of Gaffney
I see no reason for six receivers, unless we need to give Jackson a spot. Caldwell may be valuable early in the year while Jackson and Brown recover from their injuries. Gaffney won't be useful early Jackson WILL be back, or the patriots will lose a grievance. He may need to be the 6th receiver now.

The Patriots will only lose a grievance if they IR Jackson even though the doctors say that Jackson is ready to go.

I would keep four tight ends if Thomas is given a roster spot. We can always sign Gaffney later when he is healthy.
I think that Thomas is going to start on the PUP. I think that Gaffney could be given an injury settlement, opening the way for a return later in the year, IF he wants to come back and IF the Patriots have room for him.
DaBruinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2007, 03:57 PM   #16
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,642
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: 8/25 Roster Prediction

Quote:
Originally Posted by AzPatsFan View Post
I too think Rodgers is chosen over C Brown.

But I think you guys don't consider the Shadow roster fully. What is it? What do you need to be and STAY (!) a candidate?

I think most of all a willingness to try for a ring. Secondly willingness to bypass other offers, or to not have any other offers, but still be useful to the Patriots. How can that be? A player useful to the the Sb contender but not useful to a n Oakland? If you are deemed "over the hill" and done; or you play a position that needs some acclimation before you can be useful. Having played for or trained with a Team makes that much more possible, to be immediately useful.

I think the typical Shadow Roster guy is an aged ex-starter veteran, who is trying to get a last season, and or ring in his last season. Either that of a ping-pong ball younger guy who has bounced off and on the roster several times, like a Hank Poteat. But these guys are more likely to be called "street free agents" than true Shadow roster candidates, unless they have TRAINED with you as well.

This year there are an inordinate number of Shadow roster candidates that have played with or trained with the Patriots, of the ex-veteran starter type guys, who could give you a game or three, or more likely a few plays per game, of good quality.

Let look at them position by position:

QB Vinny Testaverde Vinny is on the regular roster. I don't see him being cut any time soon. Just from the standpoint of the comfort level he brings for Brady and the Pats.
RB Corey Dillon, Patrick Pass Dillon and the Pats have parted ways. Patrick Pass signed in Houston and was NOT a favorite of Belichick's
TE (but David Thomas on PUP; Kyle Brady if he is weeks away and cut)
OL Gene Mruczkowski ( Or Hochstein if weeks away and cut) I think that Mruczkowski, if he's cut, is gone to the Jets... Unless they take Elgin...
WR Troy Brown and CJ if off PUP eventually

DL Rashad Moore if he is cut; Kenny Brown Who is Kenny Brown? Do you mean Kenny Smith or Kareem Brown?
LB Chad Brown if he is cut
CB Samuels if he holds out or Tory James if he is cut James hasn't impressed me at all. I think there is a good chance he's cut outright.
S Hawkins and whoever is cut
ST Hawkins, or Izzo if he is cut, or another DB cut.
P Josh Miller Miller could be back. But there was a reason the Pats brought in Mitch Berger for a try-out even when the Pats had 3 punters in camp.
K Street FA

The Patriots may have arranged it so that they have a Shadow roster candidate at EVERY position, save kicker. The Pats have arranged so that there is a valid, TRAINED, and useful veteran most likely available to them, in the even of need. This is above and beyond the usual PS suspects, and street Free Agents for this year's Super Bowl push. The only position not potentially covered is Kicker, and there are always a few free agents available there. "No holes anywhere, anytime" is Bill Belichick's philosophy, and he and Scott are working it to perfection, much more so than ever before, IMHO.

And we haven't considered the PUP list thoroughly, either. Welcome to the benefits of the 53; plus 8 PS; plus 11 shadow roster; Plus 5 PUP roster.

That adds up to 77 man roster. It's almost unafair and yet valid buy the rulesand still $8 million under the cap. How can others compete with a roster innovation of that "depth"?

This insight should help illuminate some decisions on final cut downs for you. E.g. Vinny Testaverde, Chad Brown, Kyle Brady, and Larry Izzo might not be all that surprising cuts, if you plan on having them back in a few weeks...
I think that people are too often fascinated with the idea of a shadow roster and make one up where there really isn't one.

For instance, I don't see Dillon being on the shadow roster. The Pats parted ways with him. Plus, they have Quinton Smith who has run very well and will probably be a PSer.

I also don't see Kyle Brady being cut unless its an injury settlement.

I don't think that the Chad Brown experiment was any more successful this time than it was last time so I don't see the Pats bringing him back if there is an injury at OLB.

Larry Izzo, though I have said he could be cut in years past, has proven me wrong time and again. He still is as good now as he ever was on special teams.
DaBruinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566