ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
I'm reading all the post-game threads and this question surfaces: If this game was played 9 more times under identical circumstances (dome, flu, etc.), how many W's do the Pats take home?
Think before you answer...
I say the Pats would win 3 or 4 out of 10. We were just a few frustrating plays away last night, but these teams are both great. One key point about each team:
Pats: a lot of patchwork this season...expertly managed...but against an excellent team, those things get exposed.
Colts: The O matured, as someone said. But the BIG change was that Dungy finally got his small, fast D playing like the Tampa Bay team. I thought they'd get exploited in the playoffs. That they didn't is a scary thought for the future.
Bottom line: the Colts at the end of the season are a more complete and balanced team. The Pats has some holes to fill this off-season. My hats off to both teams.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
I say none. The Pats would have never gone up 21-3 if played a million more times. If not for some spectacular plays by the secondary, the Colts would have gotten a big lead early. Make no mistake, Peyton was on target for most of the day, he just didn't convert it into points until the 2nd half.
I say none. The Pats would have never gone up 21-3 if played a million more times. If not for some spectacular plays by the secondary, the Colts would have gotten a big lead early. Make no mistake, Peyton was on target for most of the day, he just didn't convert it into points until the 2nd half.
None?
Well, the last time we played in the RCA dome, the Patriots went up by a similar score, and almost blew the game in the same way. The only difference is we had a healthy defense on the field at the end.
I say none. The Pats would have never gone up 21-3 if played a million more times. If not for some spectacular plays by the secondary, the Colts would have gotten a big lead early. Make no mistake, Peyton was on target for most of the day, he just didn't convert it into points until the 2nd half.
I couldnt agree more. I think that was the 1 in 10 chance that the pats would win that game. And they still didnt win. The play of Hobbs and Samuel early on, as well as the run defense in the first half were the keys, and the run defense needed to continue to be stout. When that did not happen, in combination with other things, lead to the demise of the team last night.
Well, the last time we played in the RCA dome, the Patriots went up by a similar score, and almost blew the game in the same way. The only difference is we had a healthy defense on the field at the end.
The thing you miss is THIS TEAM never played in the RCA Dome before. That was another team and overall a better built team than the one we ultimately fielded this now past season.
Well, the last time we played in the RCA dome, the Patriots went up by a similar score, and almost blew the game in the same way. The only difference is we had a healthy defense on the field at the end.
Ironic the reversal in score from that game. I knew even when up 21-3, the Colts would rally. The Pats were fortunate to even be up that much. I believe a closer game would have favored the Pats, though. The offense and defense would have been a little more focused rather than trying to sit on an 18 point lead.